Columbus innovator Leader Technologies, Inc. was suing Facebook for patent infringement on Nov. 19, 2008 in Delaware federal district court. Reagan-appointed judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. was assigned the case.
While the case was preparing for trial, and despite four motions to compel, Mark Zuckerberg stonewalled providing his 2003-2004 Harvard computer devices and emails for review in the case. We now know that his attorneys at Gibson Dunn LLP had custody of 28 Harvard computer hard drives and emails. After stonewalling for a year, they lied to the court and said they had lost the information.
We believe Facebook and Zuckerberg hid this information because it will prove that Zuckerberg is a mere stooge of the rogue C.I.A. and was given the programming code from the IBM Eclipse Foundation to start Facebook. It will prove that IBM was given the code from James P. Chandler, III who stole it from his legal client Leader Technologies, Inc.
What Leader had no way of knowing was that Chandler was working intimately at the highest level with the Secretary for the Department of Defense’s Highlands Forum to weaponize the Internet. He held illegal private meetings with favored private companies to set policy on how the Internet would be controlled and profited from by the military-industrial complex.
This cabal of military-industrial complex criminals have used Leader’s invention for 17 years for free. Leader’s shareholders across the country are starting to file Miller Act Notice to demand that President Donald Trump pay them for using their property without compensation.
While Zuckerberg was openly lying to the court, Hillary Clinton and the State Department entered into secret contracts with Facebook to build “a template for winning elections using advanced Facebook marketing.” These contracts were managed by “Dmitry Shevelenko” whose Russian background has been obscured by the shadow government.
In American courts, litigants have a solemn right to a fair trial. Litigants have the right to assume that no government representative will use their position of public trust to interfere in the case in favor of either side. When a government representative interferes in a case, that crime is called “obstruction of justice” for obvious reasons. Those interfering are attempting to influence the outcome of the case in favor of one of the parties.
In American elections, citizens have a solemn right to a free and fair election. Citizens have the right to assume that no government representative will use their position of public trust to interfere in an election in favor of either candidate. When a government representative interferes in an election, that crime is called “election tampering” and is a violation of The Hatch Act.
In American public contracts, citizens have a solemn right to transparency regarding the spending of public funds. Except in special circumstances, government representatives may not use their position of public trust to favor certain private parties in uncompetitive contracts. When a government representative enters into no-bid contracts and colludes with the General Service Agency (GSA) to hide the existence of those contracts, that crime is called “fraud.” When such fraud involves parties across state lines, that crime is “racketeering.”
PAY LEADER FOR 17 YEARS OF FREE USE OF THEIR SOCIAL NETWORKING INVENTION; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN RAISE $200-500+ BILLION IN SURCHARGE REVENUES FROM SOCIAL NETWORKING WITHOUT RAISING TAXES!
In conclusion, the crimes described above alone are enough by themselves to convict an average American of racketeering and treason. The evidence of these crimes come from Hillary Clinton’s private email server.
Original post:
https://aim4truth.org/2017/10/26/hillary-paid-facebook-to-rig-elections-while-colluding-with-russian-uranium-one/
![[Philippine corruption] Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines The Political Economy of Authoritarianism #9/163](/assets/noimage.svg)
