Veteran Bitcoin developer Peter Todd is once again addressing rumors that he is the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. These speculations resurfaced following the release of HBO’s documentary Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery, which has ignited lively debate within the cryptocurrency community.
In a recent interview, Todd categorically dismissed the notion that he could be Satoshi, calling the association misguided. Despite public speculation, Todd maintains a clear stance, emphasizing he is not the anonymous Bitcoin creator.
Todd did acknowledge his connection to a prominent Bitcoin figure who potentially controls assets valued at $74.4 billion. This affiliation has led him to adopt additional security measures, though he declined to specify details, stating that keeping specifics concealed is essential to deter potential threats.
Countering rumors propagated by Wired, Todd also clarified that he is not in hiding or avoiding public life. He recently attended a Bitcoin conference in Lugano, Switzerland, where a statue honoring Satoshi Nakamoto was unveiled, and plans to participate in other global cryptocurrency events, underscoring his active involvement in the Bitcoin community.
Despite appearing in HBO’s documentary, Todd has yet to be publicly recognized as Satoshi. He believes his decision to avoid audio or video interviews has helped minimize media attention. A prominent member of the Bitcoin community since its inception, Todd is aware that his role often draws speculation, particularly given his early involvement in Bitcoin development.
Todd views the documentary’s claims linking him to Nakamoto’s identity as exaggerated. Money Electric director Cullen Hoback cites Todd’s early experiments with digital currencies and perceived similarities in writing style as evidence. Yet, Todd finds Hoback’s theory “absurd” and unconvincing.
Hoback further suggests that Todd’s teenage projects in digital currencies and an old blog post bolster his theory, but the crypto community widely dismisses these connections as speculative and baseless.
The debate spilled onto social media, where Hoback claimed Todd’s recent public appearance was a calculated move to mislead investigators. He tweeted that Todd’s decision to speak publicly was “Machiavellian,” hinting at an elusive personality. Todd, however, sees these assertions as just the latest in a series of assumptions regarding the true identity of Satoshi.
Meanwhile, new research suggests Nakamoto may have been a collective rather than an individual. Linguistic patterns in the Bitcoin white paper, which alternates between “we” and “I,” indicate the possibility of a team operating under a single pseudonym. Further analysis reveals that while the white paper displays impeccable, precise English with sophisticated technical language, Nakamoto’s writing style varied in forums and emails, suggesting multiple contributors.
Additionally, the timestamps on Nakamoto’s messages support this theory, with varied hours of activity hinting at a team spanning multiple time zones.
Theories about Nakamoto’s residence remain unresolved. Some speculate Nakamoto lived in the U.K., while others suggest California. An article titled The Time Zones of Satoshi Nakamoto analyzed activity patterns and concluded that Nakamoto’s most active times align with Eastern Standard Time (EST). If Nakamoto was indeed a group, this would account for activity across different time zones.
These findings continue to fuel debate over the mystery of Satoshi’s identity, with each new theory adding layers to the enigmatic origin of Bitcoin.
