Apparently there's been discussions on the subject and I'm somewhat upset about it. I mean, one would think that the OGs, the big dogs, or however you want to call them would know better, but now I'm not so sure.
techhive.com>
As a matter of fact, the very reason why ETC (ethereum classic) exists, is because they did a reorg, and those who held on to their principles, could simply not accept it. Yes, ETC has plenty of issues today, and it's quite vulnerable so you could say it lost the battle for the name, but the point does stand. It was a risky move, and for a blockchain as big as BTC is simply not worth it.
Truth is, there's a big percentage of those 7000 BTC that will sit still waiting for the dust to settle, then they will probably be swapped in mixers, sent to decentralized exchanges and what not. I suspect this was an inside job, and that the group of hackers know how to play the longer game too.
As for the funds for Clients, well, that's why there's #safu and CZ has informed its users they have enough funds to cover the loss. But again, absolutely NO REDO.
MenO