I have been active a few days on proofofbrain and I read a post about the discussion automation on POB. I think automation on POB is not a good idea to make a project successful, it will just make destroy the project.
Before make destroy the project we can take a look at the previous problem on steem. Where stakeholders and curators do fraudulent farming without thinking about quality content that makes destroy the project. Nah! before that happens in the POB it is better to prevent the that disease from coming to the POB so that it will be a successful project in the future.
As we can see the proof of brain project was created using human thinking instead of robotic thinking and also the logo used in POB uses the human brain. So my thinking is to make POB successful, it is better to curate it manually to vote for quality content.
As I read in the post 
That is why you must say "no" to anything automated. If stakers don't want to be active, then they should delegate, forfeiting upvote rewards completely. If they don't want to invest their own time curating, they can delegate to a curator, which at least forces them to check how the POB project is doing every once in a while.
Yeah that's a great idea and I would say "no" if POB was going to do any automated on POB. As said by
If you want to see a successful POB project using a human brain then don't do curation automatically. If you want to see a POB project destroyed then use a robotic brain. But keep in mind that the human brain is more great than the robot brain and human vision is good than the robots.
I am not a person who can solve many problems or have many ideas. I just wanted to comment and give a little advice on that. 馃