Are you an AI?
We might be close to the so-called dead internet theory. While it is still considered a conspiracy theory, safe to say that seeing how AI can now develop their own writing style, summarize things for us, even suggesting a lot of things more personalized than search engine would, have their own personality & quirks, they could very well be a human, a basic boring human.
With AI becoming more advanced and accepted, it's getting a lot more challenging for organic users to thrive. For example, just look at X, formerly twitter with its bots problem. X used to be a place to look for the freshest information on the ground. From earthquake, war, you name it. They have it fresher than any other place would. It used to work as the content on twitter would then get recycled to other social media and was given extra commentary. These days, tiktok seemingly replaced that forefront with news there being recycled to X, twitter and youtube.
The eerie thing is that not all of them are human generated. Even these days on Hive, there are people writing content with AI tools. If the person is truly malicious, it won't be that difficult to create a whole persona AI generated with its background story and stuff. In the mainstream media, this has happened, there's already an influencer goes by the name Miquela. She's not even a human and she has 2.5M followers!
While the dead internet theory has circulated a while ago, it has been increasingly popular and talked about. This prospect magazine article for example mentioned that real people and our needs have become irrelevant to the modern internet business. It further criticized that today, people are desperate to earn something with low quality or fake content to drive engagement as well as generating money from it. I have to agree that today the internet has become a little soulless that since internet economy booms, money is what being emphasized all around the space.
https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/technology/internet/67864/dead-internet-theory-ai
With all that said, there's also a recent phenomenon that resurface again and that is the lonely epidemic. We are not alone per se, we are surrounded by people and AI, for better or worse. We have companion but that isn't enough because lonely isn't solvable simply by having a companion.
These all aren't new but just becoming increasingly real and heightened. For those who haven't watched the movie "Her"(2013) by Adam Spiegel, I would suggest it right now because we might as well be heading to that direction where hyperintelligent AI are built and able to form a relationship with us because we feel increasingly lonely.
It's really not just loneliness but with AI becoming more accepted and used, there are also sinister implication of it. One that is common is celebrity impersonation. It is to the point that can be quite indistinguishable if they said certain things or promoting a certain brand while it was an AI generated video. Shockingly, from what I found people blindly believing those video based on the comment left with only few remain skeptical if that was AI generated. What if you made a certain decision based on this false AI news/ endorsement or what not? Can you truly distinguish human and AI?
That's all for this morning. I came across this topic a while back because I started seeing a lot more celebrities being impersonated by AI and people believing in that. At the same time, there are way too many tools to use than the common ChatGpt, Gemini or even Copilot. In a thriving business and in pursuit of VC money, it's no surprise that more services and innovation are built based on AI. It's cool and all that jazz but I remain skeptical of its implication for the current and future generation.
So, are you a human or an AI?
Don't hesitate to upvote for more content like this ! You can also support me below!
饾様饾槩饾槫 饾槳饾槾 饾槩 饾槾饾槮饾槶饾槯-饾槮饾槷饾槺饾槶饾槹饾樅饾槮饾槬 饾槸饾槳饾槸饾槴饾槩 & 饾槫饾槹饾槯饾槯饾槮饾槮 饾槫饾槹饾槸饾槸饾槹饾槳饾槾饾槾饾槮饾樁饾槼 . 饾槇 饾樀饾樅饾槺饾槳饾槫饾槩饾槶 饾槳饾槸饾樀饾槼饾槹饾樂饾槮饾槼饾樀 饾槳饾槸 饾槶饾槹饾樂饾槮 饾樃饾槳饾樀饾槱 饾槶饾槳饾樀饾槮饾槼饾槩饾樀饾樁饾槼饾槮, 饾槪饾槹饾槹饾槵饾槾, 饾樀饾槮饾槫饾槱饾槸饾槹饾槶饾槹饾槰饾樅 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾槺饾槱饾槳饾槶饾槹饾槾饾槹饾槺饾槱饾樅. 饾槢饾槱饾槳饾槾 饾槳饾槾 饾槱饾槮饾槼 饾槺饾槮饾槼饾槾饾槹饾槸饾槩饾槶 饾槪饾槶饾槹饾槰, 饾槩 饾槼饾槮饾槯饾槶饾槮饾槫饾樀饾槳饾槹饾槸 饾槹饾槯 饾槱饾槮饾槼 饾樃饾槩饾槸饾槬饾槮饾槼饾槶饾樁饾槾饾樀 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾樀饾槱饾槳饾槼饾槾饾樀 饾槯饾槹饾槼 饾槵饾槸饾槹饾樃饾槶饾槮饾槬饾槰饾槮. 饾槡饾槱饾槮 饾槹饾槯饾樀饾槮饾槸 饾槫饾槹饾樂饾槮饾槼饾槾 饾槪饾槹饾槹饾槵饾槾, 饾槷饾槹饾樂饾槳饾槮 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾槾饾槮饾槼饾槳饾槮饾槾 饾槼饾槮饾樂饾槳饾槮饾樃饾槾, 饾樀饾槮饾槫饾槱 饾槼饾槮饾樂饾槳饾槮饾樃饾槾 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾樀饾槼饾槮饾槸饾槬饾槾, 饾槺饾槱饾槹饾樀饾槹饾槰饾槼饾槩饾槺饾槱饾樅, 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾槺饾槮饾槼饾槾饾槹饾槸饾槩饾槶 饾槬饾槮饾樂饾槮饾槶饾槹饾槺饾槷饾槮饾槸饾樀. 饾槚饾槸饾槫饾槮 饾槳饾槸 饾槩 饾槪饾槶饾樁饾槮 饾槷饾槹饾槹饾槸, 饾樅饾槹饾樁 饾槫饾槩饾槸 饾槯饾槳饾槸饾槬 饾槱饾槮饾槼 饾樀饾槼饾槩饾樂饾槮饾槶饾槳饾槸饾槰, 饾槳饾槷饾槷饾槮饾槼饾槾饾槳饾槸饾槰 饾槱饾槮饾槼饾槾饾槮饾槶饾槯 饾槳饾槸 饾槶饾槹饾槫饾槩饾槶 饾槫饾樁饾槶饾樀饾樁饾槼饾槮饾槾 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾樀饾槼饾槩饾槬饾槳饾樀饾槳饾槹饾槸饾槾, 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾樀饾槩饾槵饾槳饾槸饾槰 饾槺饾槳饾槫饾樀饾樁饾槼饾槮饾槾 饾槹饾槯 饾樀饾槱饾槮 饾槪饾槮饾槩饾樁饾樀饾槳饾槯饾樁饾槶 饾槾饾槳饾槰饾槱饾樀饾槾 饾槾饾槱饾槮 饾槮饾槸饾槫饾槹饾樁饾槸饾樀饾槮饾槼饾槾 饾槩饾槶饾槹饾槸饾槰 饾樀饾槱饾槮 饾樃饾槩饾樅. 饾槡饾槱饾槮'饾槾 饾槩饾槸 饾槹饾槫饾槫饾槩饾槾饾槳饾槹饾槸饾槩饾槶 饾槯饾槹饾槹饾槬饾槳饾槮 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾槶饾槹饾樂饾槮饾槾 饾樀饾槹 饾槮饾樄饾槺饾槶饾槹饾槼饾槮 饾槸饾槮饾樃 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾槬饾槮饾槶饾槳饾槫饾槳饾槹饾樁饾槾 饾槫饾樁饾槶饾槳饾槸饾槩饾槼饾樅 饾槮饾樄饾槺饾槮饾槼饾槳饾槮饾槸饾槫饾槮饾槾. 饾槏饾槹饾槶饾槶饾槹饾樃 饾槩饾槶饾槹饾槸饾槰 饾槹饾槸 饾槱饾槮饾槼 饾槩饾槬饾樂饾槮饾槸饾樀饾樁饾槼饾槮饾槾 饾槩饾槸饾槬 饾槴饾槹饾槳饾槸 饾樀饾槱饾槮 饾槫饾槹饾槸饾樂饾槮饾槼饾槾饾槩饾樀饾槳饾槹饾槸! 饾構饾槹饾槸'饾樀 饾槱饾槮饾槾饾槳饾樀饾槩饾樀饾槮 饾樀饾槹 饾樁饾槺饾樂饾槹饾樀饾槮, 饾槶饾槮饾槩饾樂饾槮 饾槩 饾槫饾槹饾槷饾槷饾槮饾槸饾樀 饾槹饾槼 饾槩 饾槯饾槮饾槮饾槬饾槪饾槩饾槫饾槵. 饾槇 饾槼饾槮-饾槪饾槶饾槹饾槰 饾槳饾槾 饾槩饾槶饾槾饾槹 饾槩饾槺饾槺饾槼饾槮饾槫饾槳饾槩饾樀饾槮饾槬 饾樀饾槹饾槹. |