Let's approach this with pure logic.
The term, Anti-Fascist does not specify what it is FOR, only what it is AGAINST.
The term, Anti-Fascist implicitly endorses any conceivable action (censorship/protest/violence) that impedes perceived Fascism.
(1) If you object to "Anti-Fascism" because you are against violence, then you are a PACIFIST.
(2) If you object to "Anti-Fascism" because you are against ALL censorship, then you are a HATE-SPEECH-ADVOCATE.
(3) If you object to "Anti-Fascism" because you are against public protests then you are a FASCIST.
IF you call yourself an "Anti-Anti-Fascist" then you must specify which of these 3 options you are supporting.
And just a reminder,
FASCISM IS:
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a (de facto) dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. Source
This seems to accurately describe China and Turkey and Russia.
Please challenge my axioms and or point out a specific logical error and or provide a counter-factual.
+proHUMAN +proFAMILY
Your scathing critique is requested.