It's not just that it shows that it's not there. It's just the idea – again, going back to the idea that I talked about at the beginning of this space, which is an article that I wrote earlier today, it was just like, look, you're living in a fatalist mindset that you believe that there's just this secretive super cabal of people that control everything. Like, you just don't know how the world operates if you think that.
Like, 95% of his business is probably somewhat quasi-legit legal stuff. I don't know if people understand this, but most criminal networks and employers operate. Are you talking about Epstein? Any criminal network.
There is no such thing as a criminal. There's a legitimate front business. But to call a front legitimate in order for it to launder the illegitimate business that usually supersedes the front.
I don't know that I would say that. Like, he might have started legitimate at one point and then he went sideways later. No, I'm just saying, like, if you're looking into, like, any criminal network, right? Like, do you really think that the FBI spends thousands of hours in vans, you know, tracking gang members because they're always criminals? No.
They're waiting for the criminal conspiracy to be obvious and to be documented. And then that's when they take that down. Because they can prove beyond reasonable doubt because of our core structure.
Yeah, no, I agree with that. Which is good. I think what you said was a little different, no? I think you're alluding to that.
No. He might have been a bad man, but he was also a legitimate businessman. But all major criminal networks are almost always legitimate to the point where, like, I understand what you're saying, right? Like, if you, I'm pointing out that, like, that's not all that criminal networks do.
