Since the inception of the COVID-19 narrative in the media, the perception managers declared COVID-19 to be the deadliest virus since the flu of 1918. It was so deadly, we were told, that millions would die in the USA and hundreds of thousands in the UK. This was all due to a model from Imperial College.
Those modellers were wrong, but they came out warn the public again about an even deadlier second wave if people dared to go out and live again. THis is what they are "predicting" in Italian cities:
The red line represents the predicted number of fatalities if lockdown measures are eased by 40%
It looks a bit ridiculous to me.
I suppose that's why lockdown removals are being reversed back into lockdowns in many places. Cases went up as testing went up, there was a slight rise in deaths from the previous downturn, and that's enough to get things closed down again.
Most people get infected (or allegedly infected), showing symptoms, and live. Does that sound like a super deadly virus?
People test positive, allegedly having the virus, and don't have symptoms. Does that sound like a super deadly virus?
The CDC and other governmental agencies in the world decided to go "liberal" on the classification of what is a COVID-19 death, as Dr. Birx said. Doctors were pressured to code patients as COVID-19 by their administration. Presumed and assumed cases were marked as COVID. Autopsies were avoided, so no actual cause of death could be determined in the vast majority of cases. Does that sound like a super deadly virus, when you have health a agencies acting this way to inflate deaths and not even know the real cause of death?
People have been killed in motorcycle crashes, from being shot in the head, from Parkinson's and dying from other injuries, yet were marked down as COVID-19 deaths and added to the death count.
Testing sites have been caught fabricating positive cases for people who never even got tested. All they did was show up to get tested, fill out papers, then leave for long wait times, or not wanting to pay the fee. Then they get called and told they tested positive. If you get to get tested but don't get tested, they are just magically marking you as a positive case. How can we even know positive tests for people who did get tested are actually positive?
People have sent in blank test kits to get tested, and been told the results were positive.
Testing companies have been reporting 100% positivity rates, and omitting negative rates, giving the impression of extreme levels of infection when there aren't.
One person spoke out ons via video about being contacted a month after having COVID-19 to fill a survey and do a video on the experience. After saying they had a rating of 0/10 for the severity of the infection, the person calling them asked them if they would be willing to make up a higher severity for the survey anyways.
Does this behavior make sense? When a pandemic is very deadly, it doesn't need all this help to make people believe it's very deadly. The pandemic does the work. But we have humans trying to make this pandemic out to be more deadly that it is.
