You forgot the MGTOWs who are looking forward to Exowombs as a way to become a fathers without the likelihood of divorce and and subsequent parental alienation. Just find and ovum donor. There is also

This is of topic SPAM.

Thanks for the head up. But I'm not a friend of games where you can buy or trade heroes. More importantly I don't think those games deserve to be in the RPG category. RPG stands for “Role Playing Game”

That's a three month trend now.

Ja, €0.100 scheint eine Untergrenze zu sein die STEEM nicht oder nur kurz unterschreitet.

Ja, wenn Du genauer hinschaust sind es mehr Kommentare. Diese Posting hat jetzt drei automatisierte Kommentare. Wobei ein bot mit dem $trdo flag gleich einen zweiten bot aktiviert hat.

Would you mind if I take few minutes of your time? I read that article already but I didn't have anything to say. The problem of course is here: mostly publications related to tech industry + economy,

Could it be that the only thing rising is downvotes? The hard-fork was such a success. Have some !BEER and some $trdo

Computer games are a completely different problem space. And again I disagree. They have one thing in common: Motivating users to use the system. Multiplayer games motivate user to use the system despite

As I stated before, a sub-linear curve will not work. And as I stated before I disagree. PS: Almost every computer game uses sub linear curves for game mechanics. And they do so ever since the beginning

What will the next hardfork bring?

The is that multiple votes stack to generate rewards by some sort of consensus. But that doesn't work either. 20 plankton votes won't generate any reward. And with x² this got even worse. Only a small

What are you talking about? Typo. Typing mistake. No sublinear curve can possibly work. I would disagree here. It would be attacked by milking votes being split up across spam and small rewards. I case

Here you are √x from 0 to 10⁹ – the VEST of a Wale: Source: As you can see the curve is very steep at the beginning and then flattens out giving new, small user more power and reduces the power of large

Linear reward was a step in the right direction. √x would have been better. Going back to the x reward curve was a mistake. We have a healthy increase in new accounts but a decrease in authors, curators

We already have pay to play. Just pay for STEEM and play with self upvotes. Also, active users are down: Authors are down: Steem soon has bigger problems than “no effort content”: No content at all.

Putting active and inactive accounts side by side would make easier to read. Or putting active at the bottom and inactive at the top. I think is actually the worse way to show the data because it overrepresent

Putting active and inactive accounts side by side would make easier to read. Or putting active to at the bottom and inactive at the top. BTW, this is probably the most damming statistic: The loss of authors

Steem has 3 second transaction time. But almost all STEEM is stacked and not usable for purchases. Another reason why a flat reward curve like √x would have been better: Users would stake less and STEEM

Using a logarithmic scale for graphs which stack to values on top of each other isn't a good idea as it distorts the top value more than the bottom value. For all types it looks like there are less active