Economic curvature', how much artificial intelligence is responsible? part2

The above charts show that in Europe from 1950 to 2010 production (blue spots) has always been increasing. But since the 1980's (red stain) collapsed, Many people say that work from developed countries due to the free market economy - going to the LDCs or developing countries. Because, it is possible to do the same work in low wages. This increases the profit of the businessman. But in other countries such as those developed in technology, similar conditions are noticed. For example, from 1990 to 2008, the decrease in employment and production growth in China is noticed.
Now let's get a little more relevant, but come up with a different context. America's election was in the center of the incident in recent times. Borna Ahmed wrote a two-part episode in this regard. Quoting from his first episode 'United States Elections' and 'Popularity of Trumpets'

"According to Oxfam's recent report, 76 percent of the total wealth of America today is the richest, that is, 10 percent of the population in the first line. The next 40 percent of them have 23 percent assets. Then what is the 50 percent of the bottom? 50% of the world's wealthiest people and only poor people have only 1% of the wealth.
Let's see the matter a bit differently. The average asset of the top 10 percent is at least $ 4 million, the next 40 percent is 3 lakh 16 thousand dollars, and the average asset of 50 percent is 36 thousand dollars. But if you calculate the bottom 25% of the human resources, then you can see that they do not have any accumulation of resources, but on average they should have a loan of thirteen thousand dollars on their shoulders.
Barney Sanders, one of the Democratic party's candidates, whose social democratic policies got popular with young liberals 'liberals', but lost to Democratic Party's primary election by Hillary Clinton. In a lecture some days ago, she said:
"Now with the first 0.1 percent of America, the total wealth of 90 percent of the population has been accumulated."

We can look at Berne's information more closely and look at both of these graphs.![image.png]

his is not the case of the rapid development of mechanical civilization which has always reduced the workplace of the people. During the Industrial Revolution, there were a lot of workers in large factories. Before the revolution, those who chose agriculture as the main job, after the revolution, many of them left the hometown in the city. So the civilization that is waiting for us in the future, there will be no shortage of work. But the problem is that, artificial intelligence is present in front of us with a big challenge. The physical skills of humans and other ecosystems are adequate but they are not as big as possible. On the other hand, the machine also has limitations. Although it can accurately and quickly calculate the calculation, but the ability to think freely like humans does not develop in that way. As a result, the machine can only occupy the workspaces, where high quality physical skills are needed. Artificial intelligence is needed as well. On the other hand, there is also the opposite of the truth for humans. Since the nineteenth century, huge amount of manpower is needed to manage social networking and various online marketing websites. As a result, increasing the number of employees in companies like Amazon, Facebook, Google and Google. It will be clear if you look at the following graphs:

In this step of discussion we can present a comparative scenario. When seen in the last century, it is seen that the amount of horses used for human movement has started to decrease after a certain period. Because one, the invention of the motorcycle. If the horse had a significant role and demand beforehand as a worker, it has occupied it now.If the top graph is well noticed, the horse population in USA was the highest in the 1920's. Since then, the number of horses has decreased very quickly. On the other hand, the next graph shows that between 1910 and 1920, the amount of motor vehicles suddenly increased greatly. And in the subsequent times, the speed of motorized vehicles is very noticeable. So, we do not have to get to the point of making this decision that once the horse is a very useful medium for the movement of people, it is now only decorating as a pet.

These important information data above can certainly make us frustrated. But in spite of despair, our wonders await us. To know the new world, to see So, a question goes ahead of us, what does this impending future of artificial intelligence mean for us? The most simple answer could be surprising! Maybe we do not have to do any more work. We will have to spend a lot of leisure work in our lives. How good is it to think that such a world without work is heaven? - It is difficult to answer this philosophical question. Exercise is necessary for the people, but how much worklessness is comfortable? The reader himself will decide in this case. I can only tell the events of Theodor Herzl 'Solon in Lydia' in 1904. In this play Eukosmos invented a method of making flour without wheat. That makes many people unemployed. When Eukosmos realizes that this invention is nothing but a disaster for the society, then he dies by drinking poison. But is it possible to stop such an unending future of impending future? So if we really need to be ready for such a heaven, then the need to coordinate the economy should be considered first. In the last two centuries, we have to take the time to adapt to our society with the entrepreneurship of fossil fuels. And it can not be said that it still has not been fully equilibrium. Rather, the deviation there is more. Apart from the economic inequality, global warming is also the reason for our thinking. So while standing in the present time thinking about the future world, right now. Want to end with the words of Nigel Cameron, Leader of the Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies (C-PET)
"Will a world without work be heaven or hell? Now is the time to think it through. "