Preserving Human Dignity

juvyjabian(72)
Published in
GEMS
Words
902
Reading
5 min
Listen
Play
6y

Preserving Human Dignity

The rapid developments in the natural sciences, medicine and society have created the need to come up with legal regulations for specific bioethical conflicts. If corresponding decisions are not to be made purely on the basis of majority viewpoints and reasons of opportunity, but rather to reflect the moral convictions of the respective pluralistic society in a certain way, the search for a common link between the different ideological basic convictions becomes urgent.

In 1945 the international community became aware of the full extent of the racially motivated National Socialist crimes against people of Jewish faith and origin: the murder of millions. How inhumanly the National Socialists treated people of Slavic origin is illustrated by a statement by Himmler of October 4, 1943, which is documented in the Flossenbürg concentration camp.

What good blood of our kind is present in the people, we will get by stealing their children, if necessary, and bringing them with them raise us. Whether the other peoples live in prosperity or whether they perish from hunger, that interests only as far as we need them as slaves for our culture.

These atrocities were based on two National Socialist principles, You are nothing, your people are everything. The Aryan race is particularly precious, other races are inferior or should even be destroyed.

Therefore the Charter of the United Nations, the Human Rights Declaration of the United Nations and the Federal German Basic Law negated these two principles propagated by National Socialism and positively replaced them with the principle of human dignity. In the words of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, "All people are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should encounter one another in a spirit of brotherhood."

The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights in particular turns article by article against the cruel human rights violations of the National Socialists, to which more than 20 million people fell victim. Against this background, the principle of human dignity can be understood as a contradiction to the two National Socialist principles.

The principle of human dignity is the principle of the fundamental equality of all people, according to which every person owes every person to recognize them as equals. This equality applies regardless of race, gender, origin, skin color, religious or ideological beliefs and performance.

This means that the principle of human dignity and the human rights associated with it must also be distinguished from the principles of what is known as a Marxian humanism. In contrast to National Socialism, Marxism and the real existing socialism in its tradition preserved the basic principle of equality for all people. But the first principle was replaced by the contrary principle, "You are nothing, the party is everything", analogous to National Socialism.

An ethics based on the principle of human dignity differs fundamentally from classical utilitarianism. This negates the first principle, since the individual can be sacrificed to the greatest possible number for happiness. But it also relativizes the second principle of the fundamental equality of all people, insofar as, for example, in preferential utilitarianism only the same preferences are counted as equal. That is why a person with severe intellectual disabilities no longer counts as equals, because they cannot develop the same preferences as a normal person, perhaps not even like a healthy dog.

Human dignity and right to life

Whoever kills a person destroys his or her being a subject. If the recognition of human dignity is understood as the recognition of the fundamental subject position of the individual and the fundamental equality of all people, the killing of a person can only be interpreted as a non-recognition of his human dignity. The right to life, which is connected with human dignity, has therefore been incorporated into the Basic Law directly after the commitment to human dignity. However, there are several difficulties in recognizing the human right to life. On the one hand, there are so-called dilemmatic situations. These are situations in which one life stands against another. Some of these situations provide a solution in that a person is to blame for the dilemma. There are also dilemmatic situations in which the decision does not depend on a person's wrongdoing. This can be made very clear in the following. For instance, five life-threatening patients need the last available intensive care bed in a clinic, the basic right to life does not help with the decision here. Other criteria come into play. The specific decision is made against the background of the medical professional ethos and the corresponding practice. This does not place the objective right to life but the subjective right to life in a balance of principles with other principles. The patient who is not treated in this case of conflict is not killed directly, but if he is not treated, he still loses his life.

Human dignity and protection of life

The principle of human dignity is also linked to the protection of human life, even if this life is not yet human. The right to life and the protection of life should not be confused. Anyone who manipulates human egg or sperm cells in vitro prior to artificial insemination in such a way that the later-born person is seriously damaged would thereby disregard their chances of equality and in serious cases their subject position and thus the recognition of their dignity.

Preserving Human Dignity | Ecency