Perhaps we can start pushing for that with Inc and the next HF, or the next one?

I think you make more self voting because you get the author reward plus the curation. I think there are some vote selling services that get you very close to that return though, just slightly under I

Correct. Regarding vote selling being more profitable than self voting, how do you figure? You can capture 100% of your 10 votes each day by self voting... I haven't seen any vote selling service that

I could go along with that overall. More specifically though, I think if they really wanted to address "the self voting problem" they needed to go something like 90/10% split for curation/author

Glad you concur.

This is a good thing.

Funny right?

You agree?

Yea, we still haven't had a really big one. Though I think we are in the midst of it right now... I think we continue to pullback for weeks. Looking for $8,500 test and then we start going back up from

Thanks.

It's true. I think it is a terrible idea.

Thumbs up cornydog!

Thanks.

Where were you when it was $3k? Expecting it to go to $2k right? Usually how it works for bottom fishers...

They will, but at much higher prices.

If you want people to not self vote, it should probably be more like 90%/10%... but 75%/25% is a good start. 50% is not enough.

No. He is talking about post hardfork. People self voting get 100% of their votes each day, if they are forced to curate, the will get 50% of their votes each day, if they are good curators that is. This

The coming hardfork shows they have not. This hardfork is going to create less demand for SP, not more.

I was wondering who was going to point that out to him.

Exactly! I could not think of a better demand driver for steem. The only reason it isn't working better than it is is because most people outside of this little box don't know about it. The changes they