Melinda Gates was talking and she said, well, you would not believe what she said, two things, but I'm not going to tell you what Melinda said, you don't want to know, well, actually you do want to know, but you don't know what she said.

Melinda talked about being surprised of how Covid Lockdown affected the world economically but also said "We're not surprised how quickly it spread. around the world."

Australia stopped Covid Vaccine Trial

People are taking the Covid Vaccine and then are testing positive for HIV.

HIV was weaponized to murder people with excessive melanin. Covid Vaccines gives you HIV.

Covid Lockdown Not Helping, why?

12:10 PM - Facebook

Why is Covid still going up even as we social distance, lockdown, and masks?

Shane says Because there’s weeks of incubation

Shane Harro Harrison, how many weeks?

Shane said that people did not do it and that is why it did not work.

Shane Harro Harrison, and people did it. Most people did it. But that was 8 months or 32 weeks ago or 16 two-week periods.

Shane Harro Harrison said Lockdown is not working because people are not doing lockdown. Is that true? Are people not doing lockdown? Are people not wearing masks? Are people not social distancing? I asked why lockdown is not working and Shane said it is because people are not doing lockdown these past 8 or more months of 2020, this current year, globally.

Shane Harro Harrison, why did the Australian government stop Covid Vaccine Trials?

Shane Harro Harrison, False Positive for HIV

Shane Harro Harrison, people who got the Covid Vaccines then got HIV. So, the vaccines gave them HIV.

Shane Harro Harrison, what did Dr. Wolfgang say?

Your pancreas is gone ahahahhaa.

Shane responded by copying pasting the following from Sara:

By now you’ve probably all heard the news that the vaccine candidate developed by the University of Queensland/CSL will be effectively discontinued and will not be progressing to Phase 2/3 clinical trials.
Given the Australian government had entered into a now terminated agreement to purchase 51 million doses of this vaccine, it is important to explain the events that lead to this outcome, to ensure transparency and trust in the rigorous processes by which vaccine candidates are subjected to prior to approval for use.
How exactly was the University of Queensland vaccine designed?
Unlike Moderna and Pfizer, who based their vaccines on mRNA encoding the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and unlike the University of Oxford trial, which utilised an adenovirus vector to carry the code for the full length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the University of Queensland designed a protein based vaccine. Protein based vaccines use part of the actual virus protein to elicit an immune response in host cells, instead of introducing the code of the protein via mRNA or vectors, which would still need to be translated by the host cell.
Although it is the means by which the virus enters the cells, and hence is the perfect target for the immune response, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is actually quite unstable in its natural configuration. In order to stabilise the spike protein so that the immune system can recognise it in the proper configuration and hence mount an immune response against it, the vaccine researchers used molecular clamp technology to lock the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into place.
How exactly was the University of Queensland vaccine stabilised?
The molecular clamp used to keep the spike protein in the best orientation for recognition by the immune system was short fragment of a HIV virus protein, consisting of 80 amino acids. This small HIV fragment is NOT infectious. It cannot give you HIV and it is not a viable or reproducible viral fragment.
The Phase 1 trial participants, which numbered some 216 volunteers, were informed at the onset of the trial that the HIV viral fragments were used to create the vaccine. The participants were warned of the theoretical possibility that the immune system may not only recognise the spike protein carried by the HIV clamp, but may also mount an immune reaction to the clamp itself if it identified it as foreign. Although the participants were warned of the theoretical possibility, the vaccine designers clearly believed that the likelihood of this happening was extremely low.
So what happened exactly?
Phase 1 trials began in July, with the aim to progress to Phase 2/3 in December. Data from Phase 1 has been analysed to check for immunogenicity to SARS-CoV-2. And because the HIV protein clamps were used, HIV serology tests were used to check to see whether a serological response to HIV was seen.
Despite only consisting of 80 amino acids, the immune system did indeed recognise the HIV clamp and mount antibodies against it. These antibodies were detected in the standard HIV serology test that we use in Australia to screen for HIV.
So are these participants HIV positive?
Some participants have recorded a positive serological response to HIV screening. However, it is important to emphasise that these are false positive results. This means that they are actually not HIV positive because they do not actually have active replicating HIV virus in their system.
How do we know these are false positives?
In medicine, we have tools that determine whether a result is a true positive or a false positive. If a person tests positive for HIV on a blood test then we do further confirmatory testing to determine whether active virus is present, such as p24 antigen tests and viral loads.
The participants who had a positive HIV serological response were tested further and proven that they do not have HIV.
How long would the serology test positive for?
We know that some viruses are able to elicit a lifelong positive serological response in humans even after the virus is technically cleared. That’s because the common tests are testing for antibodies to the virus and not the virus itself. For example, patients who have had Hepatitis C and received anti-viral treatment to clear it, will still record a positive serology for Hepatitis C for the rest of their life. The only way to determine whether it is a false or new (reinfection) positive is by checking viral load and doing further specialised tests.
If a person has HIV antibodies and hence tests positive in serology tests, then even in the case where the virus is suppressed (in genuine cases due to antiviral treatment) their serology will always be positive as they have ‘seroconverted’.
So although these trial participants are not truly HIV positive, their basic HIV serology test may claim that they are for the rest of their life.
So if the participants are not really HIV positive, what is the problem?
The problem is that HIV serology testing is done in many settings in the community. It’s used to test for HIV in vulnerable populations, screen pregnant women antenatally, and also as an employment requirement for most nurses and doctors due to the risk of infection in clinical settings involving contact with blood and other bodily fluids.
The fact that the University of Queensland vaccine produces a serological response using our standard test would create headaches if large numbers of people have false positives. Each case would need to be investigated and active infection excluded. This will require increased unnecessary testing. The medico-legal implications of a positive HIV serology would be a murky minefield when it comes to insurance policies and other processes.
So can’t the University of Queensland just change the clamp?
The specific clamp used in this study has been in development by the University of Queensland for a while. While they can go back to the drawing board and design a new clamp, it has been determined that it would take more than twelve months. This would not be a viable option given the time delay and the ready availability of other vaccine candidate front runners.
So what happens now?
The University of Queensland trial will not progress to Phase 2/3 but data from Phase 1 will continue to be collected and analysed to determine long term effects of their vaccine candidate for proper peer reviewed analysis.
So does this mean that I shouldn’t trust these COVID vaccines?
In fact, news like this, while disappointing to the researchers involved, is actually reassuring for the general public because it really highlights the rigorous testing that vaccines go through in Phase Trials before they are approved for use. Our vaccine approval process is stringent, and it needs to be to maintain the trust of the public to ensure confidence in the scientific process. To proceed with a vaccine that produces false positive HIV serology would be to risk the public’s vaccine confidence, which is an unacceptable risk. Full transparency should always be the order of the day.
This example today is the reason why the government signed multiple agreements with different vaccine providers. They placed their fingers in as many pies as possible while awaiting the scientific peer reviewed data that validates their research and trials. That way, we are not blindly reliant on any one vaccine candidate.

• Sara

Wolfgang

12:35 PM

What did 2 top scientists say about it? Why did they file a lawsuit?

I told Shane he was retarded at 12:50 PM or aorund that time.

Shane then said something about me being mad and a Yankee.

Wow. I feel sorry for you. That is not even a response. You are not aware of your own stupidity. That's why I feel so sad for you. My heart breaks. I'm crying. Tears flooding the world. A new world flood of tears.

They say Australians who took the Covid Vaccine were tested false positive for HIV. But that is a cover story. It was actually true positive.

Australian government said Covid Vaccines can only be administrated in hospitals or places with proper CPR equipment needed as vaccines are killing people. It is very bad.

Covid has HIV. Therefore, of course the vaccine would have HIV too because that is how the relationship between a virus and a vaccine is, scientists and doctors can tell you this, it is simple math, science, medicine, it's how things work.

Breauna Williams wrote: covid doesn't have hiv🤦‍♀️ this is the dumbest thing you've ever said dude

I replied: Breauna Williams, But it does and many scientists and doctors have made videos, articles, etc, and the information is everywhere. All you have to do is do some research and you will see what is obvious.

Shane calls me stupid. Shane Harro Harrison, Stefan Molyneux would say as he often does, "NOT AN ARGUMENT."