i get this online...'chelsea would be a great leader...she is so educated,' i respond...
if you are placing value on chelsea's education, thinking she would be a great leader because of it, be honest about it. stein has a more impressive education, with higher marks, a magna cum laude, and actual education in math and sciences, rather than simply elevated language arts. by educational standards, stein would mop the floor with all clintons combined. so if you would prefer stein to clinton, there is no issue. most democrats, however, dismiss stein as a crack-pot dreamer, showing zero respect for her education and platform. i can not say you are guilty of this, but only an abject liar could pretend that the animosity towards stein from the democratic party is not visceral. if education is a basis for leadership, stein is more qualified than most. so long as you can admit that, based on education, stein is superior to chelsea there is no issue. if, however, you are simply saying you like clintons, and are retroactively fitting her time in school into your narrative, you are doing yourself, and the country, a disservice. yes, we are reading the same thread, thanks.
