Hello, dear @theinkwell

Thanks for the advice. But this time, I'd like to take this opportunity to provide proof of the ineffectiveness of using AI detectors for creative storytelling. By the way, I'm preparing a post on this topic for a Hive community.

At least, I wrote the story in my native Spanish, then translated it into English using Google Translate and corrected it with Grammarly (built into the Peard front-end).

In that sense, it's a story straight out of a human brain. AI is fantastic, but it inhibits the pleasure of writing in one's own tone. I know it will improve over time, but I advise against relying on detectors. My writing style has improved significantly thanks to my consistent writing for over six years on Hive. By the way, before here, I was already writing quite well.

I really enjoy writing and reading magnificent authors on TheInkWell, but if you suspect I'm trying to defraud you, I'll consider leaving. You know, I've learned a lot about the art of storytelling and describing with skill here, and every challenge, beyond the rewards, represents an opportunity to learn and improve.

I'll think about it!

In the meantime, I'm attaching the image of the result of a random AI detector I used (although, to be honest, I don't trust these very much, although this time it was 100% accurate).

On the other hand, the results in the English translation, I judge the 100% reliability of human writing impossible. This is due to the use of translation algorithms. However, the test also shows evidence of the AI's assistance in my writing, just as any automatic spell checker would do in old-fashioned word processors.

Greetings, have a great day, full of blessings and good things.

Originally written in Spanish and translated into English with https://translate.google.com