You are arguing two mutually-exclusive positions now.

1. We need taxation to remove money from circulation as a response to prior injection, even durther undermining the purpose of money in a functional economy of production and exchange and punishing those who have the money last while continuing to reward those who received it first. This creates new problems, and doe snot address the root problem of inflating the money supply in the first place.

2. You also argue that instead of removing that money, we need a government monopoly funded by extortion to provide several services and redistribute that money accoridng to the whims of central planners. You are begging the question of whether we need a government monopoly for any of those services in the first place. Even absent taxation, you seem to support the notion that politics can somehow inject virtue into the inherent wase and abuse of monopoly. That is absurd.