Exactly.

For the art and photo things, it is no different than having your images on a royalty site the only difference is being able to very easily determine if someone truly owns it.

So true. Easier to verify if the art is made by the one who is said to be the artist. And the only thing that is not possible with traditional art. Or could be but very rarely done. Secondary sale commissions. The original artist gets a cut. That is absolutely magnificent!

Big companies like Twitter are making NFTs look bad in the eyes of general population, normies who have no idea what an NFT can be except that it's bad because it runs on coal. I am so fed up with this "NFTs are bad because POW mining uses nonrenewable natural resources". I mean come on! That's as old shit like "blockchain is a pyramid scheme" phrase. Grow up, read and learn stuff! And now that Twitter does NFTs, initially looks okay or at least interesting, but when you dig deeper, is something that may even harm the original artist, mostly brings money to twitter and makes things more fucked than before. If the normies fiend out they immediately think all NFTs are the same and (again) bad.