Ooo. The last couple of sentences there seem to hit on what I was thinking about with my last couple sentences!

That's a deep cut.

Whoa yeah. I had no idea:

Player 1 bonus roll 19 go north go west follow instructions to open safe (turn right 3 full turns, stop on 40; turn left and stop at 6; right to 29; left to 22; open)

player 1 bonus 7 axe this walker 1 axe this walker 2 axe this walker 6!

Perfect.

player 1 bonus 18 axe (4) swingthrough and get them both! shoot pistol to east walker 3 miss shoot again 6 hit!

But can you figure out if it actually has changed hands for more than any other sat? Are there collectors who care enough? Or am I misunderstanding. You're saying it would be worth more for the same reason

Well, your premise was predicated on the first sat after halving being worth more. Is that true? Because I think your assumption of behavior can still be valid if your premise that one sat is worth more