RE: RE: Artificial intelligence, low ratings and voting criteria in steemit
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Artificial intelligence, low ratings and voting criteria in steemit

fucho80(69)
Published in
#ia
Words
223
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

Hello my dear forykw@forykw, I am grateful for your response, Thank you for taking this time and writing this extensive message for me, that shows your interest in helping and for me it is very valuable.

Now...

Hopefully you don't see me as a crazy person. LOL

hahaha Definitely not, I don't think you're crazy, I think you're a realistic person who believes a lot in the future and in the evolution of our society.

For the rest, I dedicate myself to writing and I don't pay much attention to the technical aspects of the platform (this is changing) but I understand when you talk about the distribution and use of our VP, I understand how careful we should be if we want to vote more Valuable publications, one of the things I thought when I wrote was that maybe people had voted in many publications a day and this could explain their behavior by voting in another publication. Anyway, thanks for the clarification.

Then there is the progress over the years and what I mean is that these things will not happen soon, although I still maintain the idea that the feelings of human beings and the connection between peers, will hardly be overcome by a machine.

Thank you friend, very grateful for your intervention, very useful for me your comment.
fucho80@fucho80