I don't understand how someone can expect you to stay committed to them but in the same breathe will tell you they will not satisfy all of your sexual needs
I woke up thinking about this while I was getting ready, it's confusing.
Belief:
If I'm staying committed to that person, surely there should be some kind of benefit to it. I get bored fast, so if i'm committed she must be doing something the others will not do. If I'm holding up my end of a relationship without a problem, I expect to have what I want.
If everything else is good in the relationship why would she care how i'm get those other sexual needs met?
She's not doing it (Obviously).
So how exactly am I cheating, if anything she's cheating by only putting 20% in a relationship.
However if all of my needs are being met, then I don't see a reason to go anywhere.
Epiphany:
According to society, I'm suppose to stay loyal to someone who will only satisfy the bare minimum. I'm suppose to tolerate them and their irrational behavior because I'm suppose to see them as better than the rest
Question:
How can one be happy with someone who will not satisfy your sexual need?
Solution:
By getting your needs met elsewhere. Not satisfying those needs doesn't make them go away. it kind of lingers like an unpaid bill. Eventually it will lead to cheating anyway.
There are FAR too many people on this planet to be hung up on one who will not meet your needs. Surely someone else will be more than happy to take that shift.
