13 of the largest 14 miners now signal their support for SegWit2x by including / NYA / in the coinbase text. It would be nice if we could peacefully implement both SegWit and a larger transaction processing capacity. It is high time to take a decision. Stop the quarrelling because combined with overly high transaction rates and a huge backlog for transaction processing this undermines the confidence in the bitcoin.
It seems to me that UASF is not the solution. An approaching user activated soft/hard fork will cause great instability in market prices, which is not good for further acceptance of the bitcoin. If the UASF has less than 10% of the SHA256 hash capacity, then a relatively small proportion of the other miners could easily take revenge by attacking the new branch, e.g. some of them could protest by only creating zero blocks. In the interest of the bitcoin, the bitcoin community needs to reunite with one solution and I think SegWit2x has the greatest chance of success.
I like to hear different thoughts on this. What is your opinion?