eviljedi

Forked Bitcoin fork will fork Bitcoin again! And it's done by Rhett Creighton who is the guy that said creating new coins is like creating a web page. Just keep printing more "money". And the

Whenever you tell someone that they can't do something, it is better to present a reason so you don't sound like a douche. Other than that good luck mate.

And these were the parts that weren't advice. Instead you presented them like facts. In my opinion they don't stand any ground so my questions were just on point. It is you who doesn't provide any

What have you been smoking? YOU CAN NOT TELL PEOPLE TO MAKE DECISIONS OR YOU ARE LIABLE FOR THEIR LOSSES, SIMPLE AS THAT. There is no law that makes me liable for any losses caused based on my suggestions,

Good luck spreading lies buddy. It comes back one way or another. If it's not up to me to open your mind, so be it!

So who is coding it? Please names! How can it have best security with no hashing power and less block time? And from what I can see, you don't understand what store of value means. Clearly coin with no

So the benefits of the Bitcoin Private is that it's controlled by central authority, has less security, single developer, no censorship resistance and no store of value proposition. It turns out that it's

So you say that it is a utility without saying what the token actually does! It doesn't make any sense. Come on! It's innovative technology, let's get into technicalities here.

Well, tell me how it is a utility and I will tell you where you are wrong.

So you think just because you don't issue your own currency, it is impossible to incentivise people with currencies that they are already using?

My condolences! I think that drug problem has a lot to do with war on drugs and mislabeling. Common misconception is that all of the drugs are equally dangerous. So after trying something completely harmless

Enigma could be a useful protocol, but Enigma token is completely useless. Why would the token rise in value 25x, if it isn't needed for any of the stuff explained above or in their whitepaper? Just because

Bitcoin price is the only one that we can be sure of to go up. Since Bitcoin has more developers than all of the other crypto projects combined. The only relevant innovation is coming and will be coming

So it's not volume than. Which brings me back to the initial point that I was making.

Volume of what exactly? You mean the size of the blockchain? Like the amount of space that is contained?

Nice to point out how many transactions are needed on this blockchain just to sustain the functionality. But considering it to be number 1 blockchain because of it is dumb. And tell me this about PoS,

"Invest in blockchains that can scale." How do you determine that? When none of them are actually trying to scale? The only real example is Bitcoin and even with the best developers in the world

Some real good stuff in here. You are pointing out that seed/vegetable oils are bad. And you are avoiding plant food altogether for yourself. Which totally makes sense, considering efficiency and cancer

I haven't tried these things on Polo. But I would think that placing buy order would just open long position and wouldn't close your short. And if there wouldn't be enough collateral left, you couldn't

I get your point and I don't agree. Still I find it hard to believe that you want to trust these guys to get the economics right. Did you watch the full video (not only the Craig Wright part)? The points