Before I let myself be taken in by all the doomsday talk since 2020, I was also regularly in good spirits that serious scientists say that the deeper they look, the better and more sophisticated their devices are, the more questions they have and the more they assume an intelligence, i.e. God. What works back on them is the fact that maths and the other natural sciences make possible what they call a finely tuned universe.
I haven't lost the desire to listen to these types of researchers who out themselves as theists or believers and it does me good to experience this. I am nowhere near being able to grasp the maths behind it and can therefore only summon up an understanding of it with my limited abilities. However, as communication is usually not by means of formulae but by means of linguistic language and a scientist is able to translate what otherwise only experts understand, I am happy to listen.
So, the message from that scientific side is not that "We know everything and that is that."
I think that the craziness of our time makes us more able to spot a cult, and to see the difference between it and culture, don't you think?
Bye, bye
RE: A challenge to the thesis of "intellectual laziness" of believers in God