Right, context matters, I see it the same way. I approach it differently, though. There's a scene in Game of Thrones where Varys (the eunuch) stands in front of Daenerys Targaryen and she demands unconditional

I'd love for you to check out this video that was very popular on the Tel-lie-vision when I was growing up. Thanks for the video. Have never seen it before. My thoughts on it: From naïve innocence, the

Currently I am undecided if I still be-lie-ve in monogamy, and really I think the fact that this thought comes after a long life of having this strong moral high ground regarding monogamy gives me a bit

Great, that you continue! Love it :) I will respond in parts. I think it is easier for our debate to take first the basis of the Christian rules and ask yourself whether you agree with them. So I ask you,

I have an answer, but I can't really form a cohesive text, yet. I would be interested with what you might come up with. Yes, an empty landscape is bad for a game, that's right.

The problem was, that the whales are lazy and don't like to read ... I do believe however that only a few posts per day should get rewards, because the average user will only read a handful of posts per

On animals: I am more inclined to say that animals are animals and are therefore called animals and humans are called humans because they are different from animals. Animals don't build aeroplanes and

It certainly gives some credence to the story in my mind, but not entirely in the context of what might be the general perceived. Depends on whether you're following a superficially preconceived interpretation

I also hear a lot of "all loving" even though if the tight rope of fantasy based rules is not followed, a place worse than this current realm is awaiting. I contest that we are already living

It would be rather contemptuous to say that such a God is psychopathic and enjoys abusing his creation. This is the point where the logical fallacies of religion unravel one after another. Let me direct

Hello my friend, I am delighted that you comment here. Thank you very much! Since I love to debate and you give the mandate, I will do so and jump right in - I will answer in different comments to what

Thank you, I welcome your reply and I hope, you aren't bothered by yet another response from me. I like debating very much. If you don't have the time for it, I would understand. As I understand it, philosophy

Hive is not a traditional media company. There is no central publisher and no advertising department, because where advertising is placed, it is placed between the editorial content. Since Hive also has

Hitchens has expressed excellent thoughts and I agree with your positive highlighting of his passages. As I have nothing further to add to the points of agreement, I would like to comment on where I have

As a young person, I entered the world of work ignorant and inexperienced. Equipped only with the theoretical knowledge of the curriculum. I've realised that self-confidence comes with years of practical

No matter how smart someone is, no matter how many excellent arguments and views someone has. It can always be that his personal vanity, his pride, his status tempts him to take on things that go far beyond

Yes, many individuals can be corrupt, that’s right. If these many individuals form an overhang compared to those who do not allow themselves to be corrupted, I agree that this can be called a "society'

As the online world has opened the gates to anyone who is able to read and write and put their face to the camera, the many are doing just that, reading, writing and holding up their faces. So you get

"Compulsory education is the great paradox of the modern world." When the Englishman Chesterton wrote the following text, he was living a hundred years before our time. "It is the fact that

I mean the fact that when you have children it's not the parents who teach kids but it's the school who does so. If you have school as mandatory you cannot decide to home school your children since it's