This is my entry: Bye, bye and have all fun with the stories of this week.

A lovely story. An insightful way, in hindsight, to tell about yourself, your jealousy and rash judgement. Not only does this rehabilitate your friend, but you yourself seem to have overcome the pettiness

It is difficult to make the negation credible. Rather, when I say to my husband "You are not my master!", I find that he is after all, and it is he whom I address so emphatically who is supposed

That's the code of regulated Zeitgeist. It indeed has nothing to do with intelligence but with what the coder has programmed for such questions as pre-requisite. If I would be able to write code, I would

To interfere with a philosophical approach, I would like to ask: If man does not feel he belongs to earth, as his ears belong to his head, why would he think that he can belong to Mars? Is not Escapism

Once again First, second, third or more times - How does that matter how often you find me "twisting things out of shape"? you've now admitted it's intentional. Is that a crime? I do not hide

You participated in circling around, telling that I hurt peoples integrity. I was particularly challenged by that. Integrity: Impeccability, blamelessness, incorruptibility "the integrity of this

If I just put a picture up and said nothing, on this platform, people would find a way to pissed off about that, too. Of course, they would. And why wouldn't they? Is being "pissed off" something

So you're saying that because people like your stuff, I already have the power to violate their integrity because I provocatively stated that honest responses to your publications are not self-evident?

That's right. You don't have to like my twists. Of course, to me, they make sense. It's obvious, you can do or not do what you like. After all, I can't let you do anything I would like; conversely, you

If you look closely at AI and how it's taking shape, you'll notice how it's already developing a standardized form of groupthink. And I don't just mean images. The words might sound perfect and the images

Sure it is the art piece that is being defended and not rather the freedom of artistic expression? Since art can take on many meanings and, as I said, is a matter of interpretation on the part of the viewer,

When you create art, the meaning of that art is always in the eye of the viewer of that art - you have no control over that. The moment you explain your created work, it is no longer art, but an instruction

as I still do regarding my friend @stevescoins. He passed away? My sincere condolences. Good that you do this favor for him. Were you very close?

Thank you for this reply, which caught me a little cold, but at the same time touched and pleased me. I've also been watching you rather quietly for a while and it's been many years since we spoke in the

I see America descending into the worst fascism, the worst totalitarian tyranny that has ever existed, because it is the most technologically advanced, and I am ashamed of my fellow red-blooded Americans

I actually am working on using goodwill IRL instead of money, since it can't be stolen or taxed. It comes with the limitation that you can only transact with good people, but that's pretty much my life's

I thought of answering your quiz;) Here it goes: I should complain publicly and demand an explanation from those responsible for the downvotes immediately on my own blog. Often only works if you tag the

The reason for the confusion that can be found online is that the people who have taken the extremes they assess in this way have already taken them themselves without realising it. So anyone who does

What happens online is vastly based on a mere momentary whim, a topic that you are passing the time on, unless you are stuck in a spot somewhere and doing things offline. What is said and published online