If it were possible for me to write a detailed and fair review about each of those applications, I would.
The truth of the matter is, @dtube is lame. I have never gotten it to work and it would appear that engagement is extremely low on that platform. I'm not sure if it's worth going through the effort of recording and then editing. I have seen others who do quick vlogs, which might be a better approach. Alas, it's bad, but not (pseudo) decentralized crap yet.
Synopsis: Lame. But, not bad if you want some votes since only curators consume your content.
While we are on the subject of videos, let's never talk about @dlive ever again. I hope they burn in crypto hell for all eternity. How's that Lino bull crap working out for ya?
Synopsis: mostly dead.
I've seen many people take part in @steemhunt, and I do get the occasional "oooh" when I read some of the Hunters' finds. They have a moderation team that are tasked to approve entries. Also, they have experimental placeholder SMTs on their platform. As for satisfaction, I was hoping to read more funny "Amazon reviews", but that has not happened yet.
Synopsis: not funny enough. Only moderators check quality, or read your posts.
Then, we have @tasteem. If you want a corrupt framework with little to no internal regulation, this is the place to be. It's so garbage that I don't even know why they have big delegations. On a 10-point scale, one being lowest, @tasteem is on "patching up holes with white list".
Synopsis: cesspool of people reviewing places they've never been before.
Am I being unfair? Of course I am! These are my opinions about these applications and I have given my perception of them. Some people love them to death, but I see most of them as diamond-in-the-rough (that's me being too nice).
