I didn't notice the "B2B hive as a service" component, but I still fail to understand why it needs more than one dev. Who is asking for this? Who is using it? How is this not a solution looking

The price is under 20 cents, and the number of users is abysmal. Meanwhile, You found a niche group of people who created a usecase for hive, a use case that you fags don't particularly like, and your

Why does this need more than one dev? Is one person unable to handle this simple task? Most devs are only going to use a few basic operations anyways. Most of these operations will not even be signed-which

So what is going on. What is the card broadcasting? Is it broadcasting the private keys, or an encrypted variant thereof, or some type of authenticate code to be matched to one of your servers. Are the

It looks like your number of users have been going down since 2023. With some 300+ users, why do you need 20 servers? It seems like much can be done on 1-2 ordinary LAMPS. Maybe double that if you need

The reason is that you presently support the hivewatchers proposal, {"id":168462,"proposal":{"creator":"hivewatchers","daily_pay":"95.000

can you take me off the buildawhale bot downvote list? And are you sure you don't want the code to up/downvote users based upon what proposals they support.

This was Dan Notestein, aka blocktrade, on bitsharestalk who doesn't particularly like independent audits. I think I'll tag @blanchy in case the matter of who is preparing the legal opinion becomes an

Here is Dan Notestein on bitsharetalk, It could be a good idea, as long as it's not too expensive. One problem with most "independent audits" is that I think they just look over the books provided

Not sure who all will read this, but my main gives out random 100% upvotes to those who support return proposal #0, so long as they do not support hivewatchers (they get a random 50% downvotes) nor are

Still more spaghetti on the wall marketing with nothing that will stick, no showing how any of these expenditures will create new users or create new investors. A simple marketing plan should be more along

sorry about that, looks like one of the official hive servers feeding the api is still producing old data and is wildly out of date with the live data. I have removed the big downvote. I have inserted

If you defense is to blow 230k of your own funds on a project that was said to cost [at least?] 10x what was necessary at 460k estimate, then perhaps you need to take a step back and realize someone might

It's just not worth 460k to do this. I am not sure your exact mechanism of how it operates, but we already have the beneficiaries tag, L2 through hive-engine and soon csv, and if you are merely porting

Most people don't respond to endhivewatchers for a downvote of .01%, since it is so insignificant that even peakd sees it as a zero and thus an upvote. Rather they go to the main account when they get

Hivewatchers is a burden to the chain who scares off users by the thousands destroying value to the chain. They'll lie however they desire to bilk the dhf of its funds pretending to do a job that we are

I made a copy of the bot, and removed the voting parts, and told it only to load that block number, and executed it. the console said upvote, which means the bot (not my main which is more random, and

I don't see anyone else trying to do anything meaningful about the hivewatchers problem, and certainly this seems unique to the chain and crypto in general. So not quite braindead. grok thinks elon would

I removed the firstamendment downvote, I am not sure why it did that. I'll have to try to hunt down the block number of your comment later, then try to manually see what the bot was seeing to make the

Not very impressed by the eth bridge. This could have been done on your own database, it could even be done on hive without smart contracts by having local bots do the work and using hive with parentpermlinks