Most people welcome this trend as it nets a positive gain, but personally it is a constant reminder that Steem has pretty horrible liquidity issues. Also, it's times like these where even seasoned veterans of the space show their ignorance of the markets.
For example, today some might have seen the market cap of Steem rise from $45M to $65M and thought: wow, $20 million dollars was added to the market. But was it really?
Market cap is an extremely flawed measurement of value. It essentially assumes that you'd be able to sell every single coin of a network at the current face value. This is ridiculous. It means nothing. It is an extremely flimsy piece of auxiliary information that most people treat as the ultimate most important aspect concerning the value of a network.
A crypto could have a billion dollar market cap valuation, but if it doesn't have the liquidity to back it up, you wouldn't even be able to sell 1% of the networks coins before the price flash crashed into the dirt. Liquidity is a much better measurement of value. How much money can you pump in one direction or the other without significantly sloshing the price around? Many consider this the true killer app of Bitcoin. No other project even comes close at the moment.
If we take a look at Steem on Binance, we see that it would only take 30 Bitcoin to currently double the price of a coin. That's right. Less than $300,000 would add $64M to the perceived market cap. It is in this way that we see how flawed the market cap metric really is.
Of course this is also an exaggeration, because we know that the STEEM/BTC pairing on Binance isn't the only market people are trading on. Even on Binance, there are STEEM/ETH pairings and STEEM/BNB parings. It would take 360 ETH ($63,000) to double Steem's price, and 3000 BNB ($54,000). If someone was aggressively only buying Steem with BTC on Binance this would create arbitrage opportunities and bots would start liquidating BNB and ETH and adding it to the BTC market.
https://bittrex.com/market/index?marketname=btc-steem
However, looking at liquidity there, we see it would only take 9 Bitcoin to double the price on that market (and only 5 to be cut in half). Therefore, you get the gist of it. It takes relatively very little capital to move mountains when it comes to perceived market cap value.
We also have to consider that bots dominate this space. Sell walls can fall away and reappear in less than a second using bots connected to the exchange's API. Wash trading happens all the time to make exchanges look more relevant. I do not trust the Korean exchanges volume or liquidity. Bithumb has almost the same volume/liquidity as Binance? Yeah right. I call bull shit. You have to be a Korean citizen to even use those exchanges.
We have so many mechanics that take coins off the exchange's liquidity books and lock it away. Powering up is the most obvious one, but even the SteemEngine STEEM-PEG token is locking away liquid coins in order to allow trading for all those other markets. SMTs will do the same.
Oh, look at that, Steem has dipped another 3 cents in the time it took me to write this. The volatility is insane, and it's not a good thing. It deters investors, and I'm much closer to understanding that mindset as I've been completely boxed in to the palnet and steemleo markets from a lack of liquidity. Let it ride! Many others are not willing to take that risk on a larger scale, and for good reason.
Essentially the only remedy for this is to keep chugging along and building more value for the network. The higher our market cap gets, the more liquidity (in terms of dollars) we will generate. Perhaps it's possible to create a DAO that helps estimate and regulate the price of Steem, but such an endeavor would likely be highly good-Samaritan based with little reward for adding liquidity to the markets (due to the ease at which to game the system with wash-trading). I guess it's something to think about.
Users must be able to enter and exit the system at will if they desire.
