I watched every episode.
Long live Billith.
In the final season of True Blood, there is a lethal disease that starts infecting all the Vampires. They call it "Hepatitis V" or "HEP-V" for short. When the cure is found at the end of the series, one of the mob-boss type vampires in charge says it's going to take months to distribute the antidote to the rest of the Vampires.
When questioned about why it would take so long to cure everyone he gives the darkest answer imaginable. He talks about all the products that could be made to never break, but corporations make them break on purpose so that consumers have to buy more so they generate exponentially more value over time. The example I remember best is a razor that sharpens itself after every use. Gillette would never sell such a thing because once you own it, you never have to buy another one. Even though the thing exists and has already been invented, it will never be sold due to the laws of capitalism.
Applying the same logic to the cure for HEP-V, synthetizing the cure at scale isn't the thing that's going to take time. Rather, modifying the cure to keep people sick and forcing them to buy a booster over and over and over is where all the money is. The Devil is in the details.
This concept is not a new one. The concept that healthcare existing as a private for-profit industry [as an extremely toxic solution] is not new. This idea that keeping people sick is the most profitable outcome for the medical industry has been bouncing around for quite some time. There are many conspiracy theories out there that claim we have already cured cancer and AIDS but the antidote stays hidden (only available to the Deep State I assume). Anyone who can comment about the history of such things below can have a 100% upvote.
“While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.”
Wouldn't you invest in a community that actually wanted to cure people instead of keeping them sick forever? Again, we see how the legacy system fails at maintaining healthy financial incentives.
Richter cited Gilead Sciences’ treatments for hepatitis C, which achieved cure rates of more than 90 percent. The company’s U.S. sales for these hepatitis C treatments peaked at $12.5 billion in 2015, but have been falling ever since. Goldman estimates the U.S. sales for these treatments will be less than $4 billion this year, according to a table in the report.
I just have to laugh at this because looks like True Blood actually grabbed that fun little conspiracy theory from an actual event that I had no idea even existed. Literally happened with Hep-C and the company lost money because they did it the correct non-evil way. That'll teach you not to keep people sick, Gilead.
“GILD is a case in point, where the success of its hepatitis C franchise has gradually exhausted the available pool of treatable patients,” the analyst wrote. “In the case of infectious diseases such as hepatitis C, curing existing patients also decreases the number of carriers able to transmit the virus to new patients, thus the incident pool also declines
Again, if you want to understand the economy, you must stop viewing people as people. People are expendable objects within the economy. And those things only exist to serve the greater economy. When the collateral value of people goes down, suffering happens. Take note.
As this relates to COVID, the numbers coming in are highly suspect. It is now believed (by actual scientists) that the variants are being caused by the vaccines themselves.
The full name of ADE is antibody dependent disease enhancement, but by virtue of sloppy language curation, it evolved to “antibody dependent enhancement”. In ADE, the disease enhancement occurs due to an interaction between antibodies produced by the host and the cellular entry apparatus that makes cell entry easier.
Also this:
A study done by Denmark shows that people who don't get boosted after 3 months are not only no longer protected from getting COVID, but in fact the chance of them getting it skyrockets by 40%-77%. That's... a pretty wild "coincidence" if you ask me. It's the perfect outcome for an industry trying to profit from the vaccines.
And you know this is a conspiracy theory that I can actually get on board with, because it actually makes sense. The whole Globalist Depopulation Agenda? That shit did not makes sense at all.
I mean maybe it does what do I know about predictive programming?
The idea that vaccines would be used to kill billions of people doesn't make any sense from the perspective of capitalism. That would destroy the entire economy and create so much chaos that nobody can profit from such an outcome. If anything, the vaccines would be used to sterilize the population, because sterilization is a superior way of lowering population size. This is why we've transitioned from killing stray animals to trap/neuter/return programs with feral cats and the like. Animals that can't procreate but compete for resources cause population levels to go down. People are animals. People are things. The economy doesn't care about you or anyone else.
Ah but even the depopulation agenda doesn't make a lot of sense in terms of capitalism. Depopulation creates deflation, and deflation also kills economies pretty good. So again, what do we have left?
A conspiracy theory that revolves around keeping people dependent on getting booster shots every quarter is much much much more believable. This is a scalable solution because it is a profitable solution. Think those vaccines are going to be free forever? Think again. Even your local crack dealer will give you free product first to get you hooked. Why would a vaccine be any different?
Have I done any actual research here? No.
Have I checked my sources? No.
Am I spinning a bullshit story? Maybe. I don't know.
Facts are irrelevant here. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. This is just another prime example of intuitive Global Thinking and the extrapolations that can be made from it. For the most part, I'm telling a story to people who already believe the story. This is an echo chamber.
The main point of this post is quite simple. When looking at conspiracy theory, we must ask ourselves one simple question: Who gains? If the answer to that question is convoluted, there's a much better chance it isn't true. If we have to do mental gymnastics to invent an entire Deep State global depopulation agenda that also somehow benefits the rich by way of magic? Well, that's probably not totally accurate.
However, if we take a known privatized for-profit corrupted industry and show how profit can be made from the lie, well that's much more believable. Again, not saying any of this is true, only that the chance of it being true is higher due to the conspiracy actually making sense within our understanding of capitalism.
It really does. Legacy capitalism can not profit from healthy happy citizens, but crypto can. Legacy capitalism can not profit from studying plants and holistic medicine, but crypto can. Legacy capitalism can not profit by paying their citizens to diet and exercise properly, but crypto can. Crypto is the silver bullet that fixes everything, as ridiculous as that may sound. We are simply lacking the infrastructure and adoption that will eventually get us there.
