For those of you that haven't heard, Binance recently accounted that they are halting all trades for stable coins. All except BUSD.
- Binance will remove and cease trading on the following spot trading pairs at 2022-09-26 03:00 (UTC): USDC/BUSD, USDC/USDT, USDP/BUSD, USDP/USDT, TUSD/BUSD, TUSD/USDT.
- Binance will remove and cease trading on the following spot trading pairs at 2022-09-29 03:00 (UTC):
ADA/USDC, ATOM/USDC, AUD/USDC, BCH/USDC, BNB/USDC, BTC/USDC, BTTC/USDC, EOS/USDC, ETH/USDC, LINK/USDC, LTC/USDC, SOL/USDC, TRX/USDC, WIN/USDC, XRP/USDC, ZEC/USDC, BNB/USDP, BTC/USDP, ETH/USDP, ADA/TUSD, BNB/TUSD, BTC/TUSD, ETH/TUSD, TRX/TUSD, XRP/TUSD.
BUSD Auto- Conversion for users' existing balances and new deposits of USDC, USDP and TUSD stablecoins at a 1:1 ratio.
In order to enhance liquidity and capital-efficiency for users,
As is always the case, centralized exchanges spin everything they do into a favor for their users. Don't worry, we're removing all these trading pairs that you use all the time, but we're doing you a favor. Like, it's comical. I remember when Coinbase jacked up their trading/withdrawal fees and claimed it was a good thing for users. Like, shut up. You're dumb. Not fooling anyone with that shit.
To be fair, consolidating liquidity on a massive platform like Binance is not a terrible idea, but at the same time anyone can see that this didn't actually need to happen. Binance trading pairs are massive and slippage is always low compared to other options. So why completely get rid of three very popular stable coins?
The conspiracy theory side of the equation is pretty obvious. By converting all stable-coins into BUSD, this gives Binance a lot more power over a derivative dollar that they control. Essentially they are funneling money into their own bank account. If BSUD is backed by dollars in a bank, they are basically just selling off the stable coins they control into dollars and then shoving them into their own bank account. Nice move.
The higher the liquidity is of BUSD, the easier it becomes to "print money out of thin air" and do all the shady stuff that banks are constantly getting away with. The peg of a stable-coin can easily be maintained with a small fraction of the collateral 99% of the time. Do I think that's what's going to happen? No, not really. I actually think there is another reason why this is happening.
They know that stables like USDC, USDP, and TUSD are not nearly as safe and foolproof as the marketing leads us to believe. UST collapsing to zero was a massive wake up call. There's no reason that one of these other stable coins wouldn't do exactly the same thing. They are all centrally controlled by corrupt/greedy institutions.
From this perspective, the move to consolidate stables into BUSD is a pretty prudent one. Binance can't control what these other stable coin issuers are doing, but they can control what happens with BUSD, thus they can ensure that if and when shit hits the fan that BUSD stands tall above the rest. That would be a pretty huge victory for CZ.
For all the shit that Bitfinex gets for "printing money out of thin air" and all that, there's a reason they are at the top of the market cap. They know what they are doing and they aren't looking to rock the boat. The accusation that they can print money out of thin air and then dump it for Bitcoin without breaking the peg is completely asinine. That's not how markets work. Anyone that thinks this is possible is living is LaLa Land.
It doesn't matter if USDT is pegged 1:1 with USD. In fact the way that Bitfinex does it is probably better than a 1:1 peg. Wouldn't you rather have some of that collateral stored in a more decentralized way? People get caught up and don't realize that storing 100% of the money inside of the fractional reserve banking system is not a smart option.
For example, if the peg in question is a BTC/USDT pair, then the only way to maintain the peg when USDT goes under a dollar is to pump BTC into it. See the problem here? If they only have USD in a bank, how are they going to maintain the pegs of actual liquidity pools? Sell USD into BTC and then dump the BTC? That extra jump has a lot of negative consequences. Better to just store 1% of the collateral in BTC for day to day operations. It's obvious, but no one cares and they just want to call foul on a legitimate business.
But at the same time we have to wonder if Binance is struggling and this is a sign of that strain. Considering they were buying out a bunch of companies going under during the crash I kinda doubt it, but you never know.
Binance, like all other exchanges and corporations, are liars and spinsters. When they attacked Steem with customer funds did they admit they fucked up and were insolvent? No, "we're having wallet issues". Did they help the situation? "No, we have a corporate policy of non-involvement". LOL, what a joke.
So when they liquidate three different stable-coins into BUSD (an asset they control) should we really accept the explanation blindly at face value? That would be extremely foolish. Like every corporation, Binance wants more money and power. This is a blanket reason for everything they do. 'Good' and 'Bad' are irrelevant. Capitalism is true neutral opportunist.
Unfortunately, I think this bodes very ill for any kind of possible HBD listing in the future. No way to get HBD listed on Binance now with something like this happening. Too bad. There's always the chance that enough dapps get created that use HBD and that demand gets us some free listings, but that's a years-away type deal.
Like I said earlier, I think Binance actually has legitimate concerns that one of these coins will crash to zero just like UST did. Is consolidating liquidity pools also a smart idea while bolstering the BUSD coffers? Sure. Decisions can have multiple reasons attached to them. But at the same time corporate public relations will only officially announce the most justified one. This is definitely a situation we should be keeping an eye on.
