DAOSTACK Project and Relative Majority

Relative Majority

It has a straight-forward form of the scalable decision-making process. It has demands on the relative majority to approve the decision. The majority of relativity will mean the majority of approvals through the respect for those who cast their vote and all the potential voters into the system.

Every size of these balls reflects the voting power of agents. The empty balls are those who do not cast their vote on some specific proposal. The darker balls are voted yes and the lighter balls are voted as no. Though there is no absolute majority for approvals there is some relative majority of approvals for some voting agents out there for all.

The issue with Relative Majority

The relative majority votes require consideration for a finite time for the window proposals. It solves some issues related to this. The previous systems of governance will introduce with the quorum. The minimal amount o voting power will be required for engaging in the decision for making a legitimate approval. Sometimes it seems impossible to solve the problem with a quorum to fix with the right amount of it.

If the problem cannot be solved, then it will either damage it at the lower resilience, or the scalability will be settled higher. In some critical point, both can be done together. If it is found that almost all the quorum is required to be dynamic then it will need to describe the resilient governance protocol through the next. Without the quorum, it will create the quorum based on the relative majority of monetization of attention.

Holographic Consensus

It has already been said that the solutions need to be verified for resolving the scalability of the governance system. The core tension among the scalability and resilience lies far away partially. This issue of this consensus system should have the much collective attention that will be spent on the decisions to make the system unscalable until the potentiality of resilience does not provide any faulty decisions or any such decision that will never represent the consensus.

The native consensus is not scalable too. The decentralized and scalable governance system should permit the edge decisions to overcome such problems that are made by the non-majority groups. It will remain same the longer they can ensure the line with consensus. This situation can be coined as “holographic consensus” by reminiscent of a hologram. This will keep all the little pieces of the three-dimensional image containing the information of the whole picture. It can be elaborated by some separate articles that will draw as there are some basic principles behind the holographic consensus.

The holographic consensus mechanism is adopted for some possible mismatches among the decision that has been made by some smaller groups on behalf of the majority of decision making. The decision has to be made by the greater majority with enough available attention.

This will eliminate every possible mismatch to introduce a novel prediction game. It is not necessary to hold a DAO reputation to place the predictions backed by the stake on the fate of any proposal. Everyone related to the system is working hard in making the system efficient.