April 6th 2025 - Trump's Shock

(source: Wikimedia Commons)

The imposition of harsh tariffs by former US President Donald Trump has sent shockwaves through the global economy, reminiscent of the seismic shifts triggered by Richard Nixon's 1971 economic policies and the subsequent 1973 oil shock. These tariffs, if they escalate into a full-blown global trade war, could reshape the world's geopolitical and economic landscape in ways not witnessed since the 1970s. The parallels between Trump's tariffs and Nixon's actions are striking, and the potential long-term effects are equally profound.

Nixon's decision to abandon the gold standard and implement wage and price controls in 1971 was a radical move that upended the post-World War II economic order. The 1973 oil shock further exacerbated economic instability, leading to stagflation—a combination of high inflation and economic stagnation—in many countries. Similarly, Trump's tariffs, particularly if they provoke retaliatory measures from China and other nations, could plunge the global economy into a prolonged period of stagflation, with the spectre of another Great Depression looming on the horizon.

Critics, with the benefit of hindsight, argue that Nixon's actions inadvertently paved the way for globalisation and increased international cooperation. The breakdown of the Bretton Woods system led to the establishment of a more flexible exchange rate regime, facilitating greater economic integration and the rise of the US as the dominant global power in the post-Cold War era. However, this period also marked the end of the continuous rise in living standards that many countries had enjoyed since the end of World War II. Nixon's policies effectively ended the Golden Age of American and global prosperity, ushering in an era of economic volatility and inequality.

Trump's tariffs can be seen as an attempt to reverse this trend and restore the Golden Age through forced reindustrialisation. His "Make America Great Again" slogan encapsulates this desire to return to a time when the US was the unchallenged economic hegemon. To achieve this, Trump is willing to abandon the principles of unrestricted free trade and globalisation, opting instead for a protectionist, autarchic approach. This shift, while popular among American nationalists, is viewed by most mainstream economists and scholars as a regressive step that could fragment the global economy into a patchwork of protectionist nation-states.

The necessity of Trump's decision is underscored by the US's unsustainable public debt levels. The strategy of "kicking the can down the road" is no longer viable, and addressing the debt through increased taxation or drastic cuts in government expenditures would be politically and economically untenable. Tariffs, while not without their risks, appear to be the least painful option in the short term. However, they are a double-edged sword. If not implemented carefully, they could provoke a serious international backlash, with many countries viewing the US as a corrupt, declining empire rather than the beacon of freedom and prosperity it has long projected.

The long-term effects of Trump's tariffs on the global economy and geopolitics are uncertain, but the potential for significant disruption is clear. The parallels with Nixon's 1971 shock and the subsequent realignments of the 1970s suggest that we may be on the cusp of another major economic and geopolitical shift. Whether this shift will lead to a new era of globalisation and cooperation or a return to protectionism and economic nationalism remains to be seen. What is certain is that the world will be watching closely as the US navigates this complex and challenging terrain.