Call to an "open mind" of the ICO
Most ICOs consist of a federated team around a project. It is clear that while some have been able to surround themselves with good skills to achieve the expected result of the project, some dimensions have mostly been neglected: data processing, identify the fake account of the "bounty hunter", and reverse mass crypto people who helped and participated in the project, even to engage their notoriety on a wobbly project.
I understand that the purpose of the ICO is crowdfunding, fundraising, money, to continue the project, but it can not be its only reason for being.
Indeed, if you have decided to raise followers, ambassadors of your project, it is not conceivable not to meet the obligations incumbent on the ICO team, which are legally binding because there is a meeting of the supply and demand. This is largely sanctioned by the following community, which communicates all day, around the world, minute after minute. Cases of legal recourse are still sporadic but they will tend to become widespread.
Also, these questions and answers that you must absolutely bring before launching an ICO: cost, time, product.
1-cost
Will you be able to remunerate the project, the followers / ambassadors, who are the customers of a written offer?
2- deadlines
Will you keep the deadlines announced? it is also an aspect of the contract legally formed by the acceptance of the offer.
3-Product
Are you sure you have explored the viability of the project? Competition, target, volume etc ...
Despite all these brakes, you are ready. You start, and finally, this is not as easy as you imagine (80% of cases). Why ? Do you know how to define your leaks, your faults? Identify them, and bring them a soluton? It's never easy to tell ourselves that we have not anticipated everything. And yet, solutions exist, simple and effective. I speak as in a book, surely, but who has never loved a book?
With the support of a community, some of whom are just there to enjoy easy money, and others through project-related believing, there is an incalculable resource of talent and potential "helpers". It is time for some projects to open their minds and take help, in the event of a hard blow, where she is, not just in a closed team that believed she could and who realizes she can not.
In my opinion, a secondary airdrop for the "helpers", not in the form of championship but rather according to the result or the means available, is desirable. thus, the team, which remains the governing body, allocates the necessary manpower to achieve its objectives and the success of the project. It's no better than an exit scam because we get scared?
Just a few words, to remind you that talent exists and that when you create a company, in the crypto, it is possible not to feel alone as in the creation of a company "legal entity" with as only resource, the work only one person provides.
Open your minds and work together for tomorrow, get help when needed.
