Twitter posts like today's “collectibles put value in provenance ...introduces the concept of archiving the digital image of unique objects in a Facebook address to mimic a blockchain hash function as a demonstration of a methodology I'm building into a completely web3.0 art form” puts the mission in the correct context.
Steemit's lone use is to place the sequential illustrations of these posts into a blockchain and interpret the value attached to modules 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332 and 333, in the illustration shown here, as the Cryptoknot protocol's part in a methodology that is learned about on https://www.facebook.com/michaelsullivan.smith/posts/1208899475933590, and the daily posts on https://twitter.com/MSullivanSmith.
A mainstream platform's association with the concept of uniquities is what is being used to build the cryptoknot concept. The numbers now are strictly used to digitally identify the place this knot falls within the mechanics of a registry. This is put in plain language that now references the physical differences in each of the tags for the Woodstock'94 collectible due to the method of their manufacture.
The numbers of modular squares are the Cryptoknot protocol's standard for describing a specific knot. This was invented as a means of authenticating a knot when distributed designing becomes the way a new knot is created in the context of the White Paper of the http://www.greatknot.com website. When this distributed creativity goes into effect the cryptocurrency assignments in https://www.patreon.com/michaelsullivansmith will be issued.
Read next
From @cryptoknot