A connection between the estate documentation and itemizing the value of it happens when a Tweet describing “recombination”, as a concept of selective design in the art, is intentionally posted because there is a belief that the reference is going to be picked up eventually. “Recombinant” has a way of being understood by those working in system theory, so creating a situation where these 150 versions of the two-dove Woodstock logo relates to a distribution among 55,000 identifiable entities, and assuming AI image recognition to be in that mix, someone is going to understand what that means relative to the consensus protocol for decentralized transactions, even if it is presented as a conceptual art.
First to publish has a whole different meaning in the information age. An estate with intellectual properties specific to the Internet needs but the time stamp of a post to secure their value. Art is a particular case, in that it has always been as much associated with the thinking processes of an individual as with the objectivity of the outcome. On the Internet it is the entire body of work, so accessible, that brings the individual's unique creative process to the value of any single part of it.
What the theme of the intellectual properties of the estate are about is art as the “feel” a mechanistic activity. This brings out nuances of cognitive behavior in image and prose. It is this art brings to Artificial Intelligence to help it ferret out choices it can generally recognize as valuable in a process that keeps the Internet civil.
