How to keep your community engaged after mint. (A recap ) Breads.

On the episode 17 of Behind the bags, Breads, and his co hosts had many speakers live on X. Here are the names of everyone present

For the next few minute s, the hosts and the speakers were catching Cruz by making the show lively. There were 3 giveaways in the programme. The first was inleo giving $50 for engagement on a thread cast. 2 sol Nft was also to be won by reposting, and a custom gif, was open to be won by bookmarking on space

The topic of discussion was how to keep your community engaged after mint as a project owner. Many speakers pin down their thoughts on how to achieve this, and it was indeed an excellent input from all of them

Keeping your community busy until you can deliver all your promise, and being consistent helps keep people in the community. The community driven aspect matters, "Tyler" established a point for the conversation. He said most people like to have a large community before minting, but that depends on what the community goals are. Some communities need to pop to succeed, while slow growth fits into the success of some, he added

Santa vowels reacted by saying that in order to keep the community engaged, you have to set clear expectations of what your plan is. What typically causes a fall off of community engagement is a break but if there's a timeline on what is expected from the project, the community would keep popping even if there's a break. Also, he talked about over hyping of projects by some project owners. When a project is over hyped and it becomes difficult to live up to the expectations, it affects the community engagement. For instance, when the pump is over, and price falls drastically from the high high to the lowest low after the project was over hyped. It's good not to go for the high high and end up in the low low. If that can be managed successfully after minting, the community engagement will keep popping

He also mentioned that it's good to pay holders to keep them in the community, but rather, a reward system can be set for people to come in and engage. If it's about compensation in a way that's not a straight financial payment, there's nothing wrong with it. Furthermore, project owners must let their members feel valued since they are the one keeping the project alive. If they say anything positive about your project, on any platform, you can follow them, give a comment if possible, or a like. It makes them feel valued and they would want to do more

Gary on the other hand doesn't believe so much in keeping the community engaged. He believes in letting the community take their own path by letting them figure out what they want to do to make the project successful. The people you are trying to engage are not those that would give you the thousands of $ on NFT. If you want to get to a crypto punk level, those holding crypto punk worth millions of dollars will not come on discord to greet you good morning. They don't have that time. To some extent, I think Gary was right here, however, I disagree with the fact that keeping the community engaged is not a top priority in any community. Without a bubbling community, crypto punks will never have the mind to invest, because it's the community (the people engaging) that determines the success of the community. Without them, the project would fail

Jordan Freda made my favourite contribution. He's a project owner, and the way he talked about engagement really shows that his project is a successful one. Founders engaging with the community is a way to connect with the people, and it gives them the opportunity to ask questions, and give great ideas that can help the project. He mentioned that there's no point in not liking to relate with those that are making your project boom.

Thanks for reading
This is ckole the laughing gas
One love