昨天又辅导小宝贝做语文卷子。自然也少不了看图写话的环节。这次的看图写话。的图是这样的，一张图是小松鼠帮小羊摘玉米，第2张图，小杨摘了满满一筐。玉米。然后向小松鼠挥手告别第3张图，是小松鼠帮刺猬摘西瓜。第4张图是小刺猬，背后装满了西瓜，装了满满一筐西瓜在向小松鼠挥手道别。这4张图串起来一般人。都会看出，就是讲了一个小松鼠乐于助人的故事。标准答案也是如此。不过小宝贝写的一个故事倒是有些另辟蹊径。他是这样写的，一天小松鼠觉得。很无聊，于是他四处去逛，他看见小杨正在摘玉米，于是小松鼠也来帮忙，他边摘边说小杨摘来的玉米我们一人一半。可是小松鼠没摘，一会儿就看见了一块西瓜地。和小杨告别了以后就飞快的奔向西瓜地，看见小刺猬正在搬西瓜，小松鼠也像上次一样来帮忙啊，小松鼠说小刺猬搬来的西瓜我们一人一半。站一会儿小松鼠就看见。又看见了什么？于是又跑开了，最后小松鼠一无所获。
怎么说呢，我还是挺佩服小宝贝编故事的能力的，但是我也知道如果考试的时候还真这样写估计得不了多少分的。这也是？应试教育的悲哀容不得。比较另类的思想。必须按照标准答案，整齐划一的来思考问题。
为了不完全否定小宝贝难得的创新思维。你想一个说法，让他心服口服的改写这个故事。想来想去。我觉得这个故事虽然第一眼看上去能够自圆其说，其中还是有逻辑漏洞的。
我觉得这个漏洞就是小松鼠的要求。他每次提出要提供帮助的时候都会要求平分一半的劳动成果。仔细想想是是不是有些不太合理？如果提供帮助就有权主张。对别人的东西拥有所有权，是不是有些太过分了，是在侵犯别人的权利呢？如果你设身处地的想一想，如果你的朋友帮助你做了什么事情，就必须从你这里。拿走一部分东西作为报酬，你觉得公平吗？小宝贝似乎是听懂了有，然后又按照标准答案的思路重新写了一遍。
其实事后仔细想一想，这样的情况，真的就那么显而易见的不合理吗？其实这样的事情每时每刻都发生在现实当中，而。我们这些心智成熟的大人并没有认为这有什么不对。对了，这就是政府已提供公共服务，比如国防之类的。来强制。收取。税收。强迫公民纳税，就在本质上和小宝贝讲的那个故事，又有什么不同呢？而在。义务教育和。政府掌控的主流媒体的灌输下，几乎所有人都不认为这是错的。
不过我又想了想，其实在某些情况下，小宝贝讲的这个故事也是可以合情合理的。那就是这些玉米地和西瓜地是野生的，没有主人，而小羊和自慰。没有足够的能力收获这些野生的果实。那么小松鼠帮他之后，由于这些伙食是无主的。而只有在小松鼠的帮助下才能完成采摘，那么这个时候松鼠。要求占有一部分的果实则是完全合理的。
好吧，经过这件事之后。我也有些茫然，其实小宝贝的这个故事是可以。成立的，但是按照。应试教育的标准几乎是肯定会拿低分的。到底应该怎么办呢？是扼杀。孩子的创造思维去适应考试。是不要在乎分数。保持。孩子天生的好奇心和活跃的思维能力呢？你有什么看法？
Yesterday, I tutored the little baby to make Chinese papers. Naturally, the link of reading pictures and writing words is indispensable. This time, I look at the picture and write words. The picture is like this, one picture is the little squirrel helping the lamb pick corn, and the second picture, Xiao Yang picked a basket full. Corn. Then wave goodbye to the little squirrel The third picture, which is the little squirrel helping the hedgehog pick watermelon. The fourth picture shows a little hedgehog with a back full of watermelons, and a basket full of watermelons waving goodbye to the little squirrel. These 4 pictures are strung together by ordinary people. will see that it tells a story about a little squirrel being helpful. The same goes for the standard answer. But a story written by Little Baby is a little different. He wrote it this way, and one day the little squirrel felt. It was very boring, so he went around, and he saw that Xiao Yang was picking corn, so the little squirrel also came to help, and he said that we were half of the corn that Xiao Yang picked while picking. But the little squirrel didn't pick it, and after a while he saw a watermelon field. After saying goodbye to Xiao Yang, he quickly ran to the watermelon field, and saw that the little hedgehog was moving the watermelon, and the little squirrel also came to help like last time, and the little squirrel said that the little hedgehog moved the watermelon and half of us. Stand for a while and the little squirrel will see it. What do you see? So he ran away again, and in the end the little squirrel found nothing.
Anyway, I still admire the baby's ability to make up stories, but I also know that if I really write like this during the exam, I don't think I will get many points. This too? The sorrow of exam-oriented education cannot be tolerated. Compare alternative ideas. It is necessary to think about the problem in accordance with the standard answers.
In order not to completely deny the rare innovative thinking of the little baby. You want to come up with a story that will convince him to rewrite the story. Come and think about it. I think that although this story may seem self-justifying at first glance, there are logical loopholes in it.
I think this loophole is what the little squirrel is asking for. Every time he offered to help, he would ask for half of the fruits of his labor. Isn't it a little unreasonable to think about it? If you help, you have the right to assert it. Isn't it too much to have ownership of someone else's stuff and infringe on someone else's rights? If you put yourself in your shoes and think about what your friends have helped you do, it has to come from you. Do you think it's fair to take a part of the stuff in return? The little baby seemed to understand yes, and then rewrote it according to the standard answer.
In fact, if you think about it carefully, is such a situation really so obviously unreasonable? In fact, such things happen in reality all the time, and. We mature adults don't think there's anything wrong with that. That's right, and that's what the government has done to provide public services, such as defense, and so on. to force. Charge. Taxation. What is the difference between forcing citizens to pay taxes in essence and the story told by the little baby? And whereas. Compulsory education and. Indoctrinated by the government-controlled mainstream media, almost everyone doesn't think it's wrong.
But then I thought about it, in fact, in some cases, the story told by the little baby can also be reasonable. That is, these cornfields and watermelon fields are wild and have no owners, while lambs and masturbates. There is not enough capacity to harvest these wild fruits. Then the little squirrel helped him, because these meals were ownerless. And the picking can only be completed with the help of small squirrels, then this time squirrels. It is perfectly reasonable to demand a share of the fruit.
Well, after this. I'm also a little dazed, in fact, this story of the little baby is okay. established, but in accordance with it. The standard of test-oriented education is almost certainly a low score. What should I do? It's strangulation. The child's creative mind adapts to the exam. It's about not caring about scores. Keep. What about a child's natural curiosity and active thinking skills? What do you think?
