Now before I go into my rant I just want to say yes, I do know the difference between contrails and "chemtrails". This is to bring up discusson and to show that over the years its been a game of back and forth with the government, the media,
and people who don't fully understand.
It really seems lately that the mainstream media and other outlets of entertainment are really pushing to try and discredit any information that comes from researchers about chemtrails.
Whether its Snapchat collaberating with the New York Times to put this postive outlook on how this can help save us ,
to now Tech Insider putting this video out about how the trails become what they are.
When I watched this video I thought they we're going to go into the science of why that happens.
At first they we're doing exactly that and they would go from photo to video showing the contrails and it was a excellent presentation.
But then it took a turn and started showing what are obviously the trails left from planes that sprayed. Contrails do disappear indeed but those lingering clouds that have the colourful tint from the aerosal are not just contrails.
Saying that it can help "predict" the weather and the other obvious disformation is quite ridiculous.
All these years they denied the spraying and the existence of chemtrails, to Harvard
coming out to say that they want to spray the atmosphere to fight "Climate Change" , and now going back to the denial/normalizing of the danger of these trails after so many people are finally waking up and researching into the subject.
So which is it?
We will see what happens, what do you think on the subject?
Until next time get schwifty,
@bulbafett90