Yes, it is a good time to stop.
But, i would like to say something about "evidence"
The notion that the GPS satellites prove relativity is a statement that has no proof. It all came from one source, NASA. You cannot go and see it for yourself. So, basically, you are giving NASA a pass, because you were trained to believe in govern-cement and their school taught you that.
Once an idea is put into your head, it blocks out other ideas that would go into the same spot. And so, the first one goes in easily, with no evidence except the teacher told you. The next thing needs all the evidence in the world, and that is often not enough.
Lorentz contractions are a better explanation for satellites needing to update there clocks.
AND i will probably still be having this argument after it is proven that satellites are supported on balloons. (or some equally strange notion, like they are supported on sky hooks attached to the dome). So, even after the support is kicked out from under "GPS Satellites prove…" there will still be people arguing that they need strong proof to accept strong claims.
Thanks for watching that video. It will at least help you understand what will be coming out soon.
RE: Choose 1: Nikola Tesla vs Albert Einstein