right?

Incorrect.

And this is the entire problem with modern materialistic science.
That is not what the M-M experiment showed at all.
But it is what everyone BELIEVES it showed.

The M-M experiment was based on one view of the world, and one view of how aether worked.
So, we are supposed to be on a ball earth, hurtling through a static non-moving aether.

But, as you know from previous replies, we may not live on a ball earth.
And if you studied aether theories, you would know that this was the least likely of the theories to be true.

So, if we ranked aether theories by their strengths, from A to Z, then the M-M disproved Z.
It didn't disprove most of the rest of the alphabet.
ABCDEF HIJ L MNO QRST U XY are all still valid aether model theories, and have never been tested (according to modern materialistic physics.)

FURTHER!!!! M-M experiment didn't find nothing, it found something, and called in nothing.
That is just wrong science!
(they expected a big number and got a little number. And then just assumed their high precision instrument just wasn't high precision enough, so the concluded the measurement was an error)
(also, they did the bare minimum of measurement to even be considered an experiment.)

failed to predict certain astronomic-scale effects with sufficient accuracy, so it required refinement or replacement.

If this were true, than, by that logic, the Theory of Relativity should have been thrown out.
Yes, relativity was better at predicting the orbit of Mercury than Newton.
But, what happens when someone comes along and makes a better theory?
Einstein was 96% correct.
And recently, a lady came up with a theory using equal area in equal time that is 99.999% accurate.

So, boo-bye Theory of Relativity, right?

But this isn't all.
The speed of light has been breached.
The Theory of Relativity is built on the premise that the speed of light is the maximum. So, if that premise is destroyed, so to should the theory.

And further!
Aether theory and the Electric Universe model is better at predicting all the phenomena that Relativity supposedly did a better job at. So, again relativity looses.

How many more holes does one need to put into the Theory of Relativity before it is considered falsified?

Lastly, if we have gone really far down a path that is wrong. (we are lost out in the woods)
What is the correct direction science should go to find truth? (follow the path back)

Or, in other words, if we define B as the opposite of A
The yes, with A being wrong, then B is correct.

Since the entirety of modern materialistic physics is based on NO-aether
Then when aether models are shown to be far more accurate at predicting
Conclusion is, that we need to completely rework the last 100 years of science.
So,