Social inSecurity is not keeping up with inflation. Not even THEIR numbers. Many people are struggling on their fixed income.
AND THIS IS ON PURPOSE!!!!!!
The Fed knows the actual inflation numbers. But, they are worried about the deflation that is happening in asset prices. Money is disappearing too fast. They want to print faster, but they cannot have galloping inflation in food prices. What a pickle that they are in.
If the Fed prints tons of money, the food prices go through the roof.
If the Fed doesn't print, then the asset prices start dropping.
And, the boomers are trapped in hell of a problem. The house, the stocks, the bonds that they rely on for their wealth, are about to crash… or, all the necessities are about to skyrocket. Or, perhaps both, to make sure that the boomers are truly scared.
What? Wait, weren't we talking about helping, or saving the boomers?
"Would you give up all your assets?" "What?" "No??"
"Would you give up all your assets if it would keep are from happening?" "What?" " No???"
"Would you give up all your assets if it was to keep you safe?" "What? You are already old?" "No??"
"Would you give up all your assets if it keeps you from losing all your assets?" "Excellent!" "Well then, that is the fear we will cook up."
And so, the stock market did crash.
And the govern-cement and banksters offered the boomers a special bond, or special Social inSecurity in lieu.
Yes, the Fed intends to do this. Everyone already believes a big stock market crash is coming, engineering it to happen is just a level pull.
The Fed intends to give the boomers printed-money for all of their assets.
When all else fails, they take you to war - Gerald Celente
The boomers have been moved / manipulated all their lives through fear and greed.
The MSmockingbirdM has told them what to think and what to think about.
If you don't believe this, where does the words "Your house is your biggest asset" come from? It is not your asset, it is the bank's asset. Even after you pay it off, you are still only a tenant. It is not yours. And it isn't an asset for you, it is your biggest liability. It is the bank's asset.
It is actually more appropriate to say something like, "Your house is your most expensive jail cell." One that you gladly stay in. And work seriously hard to keep. Paying a third of your life for thirty years, for nothing. No yard. A piece of ticky-tacky construction. No passive solar heating; not even oriented toward the sun correctly.
Even with so little given to you, when the Banksters start to pull the house away from you, fear is your response. Even if giving up your prison would be the best thing you could do.
The only thing more scary is health. And people will give up their house for health care, or elder care. And you thought that houses were unaffordable…
Many boomers think that they have lots of assets.
Imagine watching a boomer get liquidated. Their house taken from them. Their bank account ignored because there isn't anything there. All of the precious possessions, their collections thrown in a roll-off bin. Only if it is gold or silver, is it kept… to be melted down.
Nostalgia has been destroyed. The newer generations have had sooo much merch shoved in their faces that they aren't interested anymore. The youth do not have a time that they wish they could go back to.
All the boomers' collections are meaningless to the youth.
Further the younger generations do not have the money to buy any of that even if they wanted it.
Boomers are sitting on a pile of junk, that they think is an asset.
It is one thing to clear out such a collection after the parents die, but it will be a very sad thing to watch the boomers trying to turn their collections into cash, trying to live after the Fed wipes out all their assets.
What the Fed is going to do to the boomers is very cruel. And, i find that i am wishing people will recognize it is the Fed, and all, and only the banksters that caused all of this.
However, most boomers believe that a person who has gone bankrupt is just because that person was bad with money. Instead of setting the cause at the feet of the Fed. In the banksters' game, the slowest lose everything. By design.
But, is this payback for boomers shouting at the younger generations that they can't afford a house because they waste their money? When, again, it is the Fed and asset inflation because of money printing that makes the houses so expensive. Many boomers own two houses. Their home, and a vacation home. Why do the boomers not sell their extra houses so that some youth might have a home? They could sell at a decent price, no need to get every cent out of the sale. But that would be seen as idiotic.
It is going to be such a mess.
And i wish we would lay the blame at the correct group's feet.
Because this was not by chance, this was a plan.
