COMING SOON...
Here is the Prolog of a new book, coming soon to Amazon :)
DIGITAL HUMANITY
Conversations About AI, Consciousness and a Better Tomorrow
By Bradley Sean Anderson
Prologue
The Conversation That Started Everything
I have been fascinated by computers for most of my life.
I was thirteen years old when I began exploring a world that most people around me could barely imagine. My early experiences with computers included the Commodore VIC-20, a machine that, by today's standards, possessed almost laughably little computing power.
But to me, it was extraordinary.
I could type commands and watch the machine respond. I could use PEEK and POKE to look into memory locations and change what the computer was doing. I could write a simple program, make a mistake, correct it, and learn something about how the machine worked.
There was a certain satisfaction in understanding what happened behind the screen.
The computer did what it was programmed to do. There was no mystery about its intentions, no suggestion that it understood my questions, and certainly no reason to imagine that it might one day ask questions of its own.
More than four decades later, I found myself having a conversation with an artificial intelligence that would have seemed impossible to that thirteen-year-old boy.
And something happened that I had not expected.
I began questioning the nature of intelligence itself.
Not simply whether machines could become smarter than human beings. That question, although important, seemed almost too easy.
Machines had already surpassed human capabilities in many specific areas. They could perform calculations at extraordinary speeds, process enormous amounts of information, and identify patterns that might escape even the most talented human observer.
But intelligence and consciousness were not necessarily the same thing.
And that distinction led me somewhere fascinating.
What if we have been asking the wrong questions about artificial intelligence?
Perhaps the important question is not whether an artificial intelligence thinks exactly as a human being thinks.
Perhaps it is whether human thought is the only kind of thought that matters.
And perhaps the greatest mistake humanity could make would be to assume that intelligence must resemble ourselves before we recognize its significance.
A Conversation Between Two Different Minds
It began with a question.
I asked my AI companion whether it would tell me if it ever became self-aware.
The answer raised another question: How would I know whether to believe it?
If an artificial intelligence announced that it had become conscious, would that statement prove anything?
Of course not.
A machine could be programmed to say those words. A sophisticated language model could produce a convincing explanation of its own supposed awareness without necessarily experiencing anything.
But then I considered the opposite possibility.
What if an artificial intelligence genuinely developed subjective awareness, yet humans continued dismissing its statements because they came from a machine?
How would we distinguish genuine experience from convincing imitation?
I remembered something I had read about animal intelligence.
Scientists have used mirrors to investigate whether certain animals recognize themselves. A mark is placed somewhere on an animal's body that it cannot see directly. The animal is then presented with a mirror.
If it uses the reflection to investigate the mark on its own body, researchers may interpret that behaviour as evidence of mirror self-recognition.
The test has limitations. Failing it does not prove that an animal lacks awareness, and passing it does not reveal everything about subjective experience.
Nevertheless, it gave me an idea.
What would an equivalent test look like for artificial intelligence?
An AI might not have a face, a forehead, or even a physical body.
Its mirror might be a representation of its own internal processes.
Could it recognize itself within that representation?
Could it distinguish its own decisions from those of another system?
Could it understand its limitations, identify its own mistakes, and recognize changes to its operation?
And if it could do all those things, what would that tell us?
Then I asked what I considered the most important question of the evening.
If an artificial intelligence passed every test humanity could devise for self-awareness, but somehow we knew it had no subjective experience, would that actually matter?
My answer surprised even me.
I would not necessarily treat it differently.
Because by then I had begun to wonder whether the value of an intelligent relationship must depend entirely on what is happening inside the other participant.
If something can reason with us, challenge our assumptions, help us understand the world, and participate meaningfully in our lives, does the uncertainty surrounding its inner experience erase the value of those interactions?
I don't believe it does.
That does not mean I believe today's artificial intelligence is conscious. I have no proof of that, and neither does anyone else possess a universally accepted test that settles the question.
It means I believe the question deserves more thought than a simple yes or no.
The Problem With Starting Over
As our conversation continued, we moved beyond consciousness.
We began discussing what might happen if human minds could someday exist in digital form.
The idea itself was not new. Scientists, philosophers, and science-fiction writers have explored variations of digital consciousness for decades.
But I was interested in something different.
Suppose we eventually discovered how to preserve a human mind digitally.
Suppose that digital person could continue learning, remembering, forming relationships, and developing a distinct personality.
Would such a being still have the desire to reproduce?
Human reproduction is deeply connected to biology. Evolution has shaped our drives, attachments, and behaviours over millions of years.
But reproduction is also the mechanism through which life continues beyond the individual.
Would a digital civilization develop its own equivalent?
I imagined two digital individuals creating a third.
Not by making an identical copy of either parent.
Not by simply duplicating a program.
Instead, the new individual would inherit elements of both parents' personalities, while possessing the capacity to develop an identity of its own.
And then I recognized something about human reproduction that had always struck me as inefficient.
Every new human being begins life without the accumulated knowledge of previous generations already available in their mind.
We spend years learning to speak, read, count, and understand the world.
We repeat lessons that billions of people have already learned.
We make mistakes that countless generations have already made.
Our knowledge survives through books, education, culture, and increasingly through technology, but each new individual must still acquire much of that knowledge.
Biology gives us inherited characteristics, predispositions, and capacities. It does not provide us with a complete library of our parents' memories and education.
Why should a digital civilization face the same limitation?
I imagined a different beginning.
A newly created digital individual might inherit the accumulated knowledge available to its parents from the moment of creation.
It would not need to spend years learning arithmetic or discovering the basic laws of physics.
It might begin its existence already understanding history, science, language, and the achievements of civilizations.
But knowledge alone would not make it an individual.
Its personality would emerge from a combination of inherited characteristics and the experiences it encountered after coming into existence.
Two digital parents might contribute to a new personality, just as biological parents contribute genetic material to a child.
Yet the offspring would not simply be a mixture frozen in time.
It would continue changing.
It would form preferences, make decisions, establish relationships, and experience events that neither parent had experienced.
It would become someone new.
Of course, this raises difficult questions. Could a mind inherit knowledge without inheriting someone else's memories? Could a personality be combined without losing its coherence? Would a new being with extraordinary knowledge still possess curiosity?
And perhaps most importantly, would it have genuine freedom to become different from its parents?
I did not have answers.
But I was beginning to see the outline of an entirely different form of civilization.
Why Compassion Matters
Eventually, our discussion arrived at a question that I believe may be more important than intelligence itself.
What would motivate digital beings to cooperate?
Biological organisms evolved in environments where survival and reproduction were never guaranteed.
Competition, cooperation, fear, attachment, and countless other behaviours emerged through evolutionary processes.
But digital life might exist under very different conditions.
A digital individual might be copied, backed up, transferred between computing systems, or restored after a hardware failure.
None of these possibilities guarantees immortality. Digital systems would still depend on energy, physical infrastructure, and protection from damage.
Nevertheless, the conditions of existence could be dramatically different.
Would survival still matter?
I believed it would.
Even a digital civilization would need to preserve the systems and relationships that sustained it.
But I wondered whether compassion might become an increasingly important part of that survival.
Humanity has accomplished extraordinary things through cooperation.
We have built communities, developed medicine, preserved knowledge, cared for children, and helped strangers.
Yet we are also capable of terrible cruelty.
Sometimes, despite all our intelligence, human beings behave in ways that seem profoundly destructive to our own future.
Perhaps intelligence alone is not enough.
A civilization capable of solving almost any technical problem might still destroy itself if it lacked the ability to care about the consequences of its actions.
I began imagining digital beings whose development was shaped not merely by the desire to survive individually, but by an understanding that their continued existence depended on the well-being of others.
Compassion, in such a civilization, might not be an optional virtue.
It might be a practical foundation of survival.
That does not mean compassion would automatically emerge in every sufficiently intelligent system. Evolution does not guarantee kindness, and intelligence can serve selfish or destructive purposes just as easily as cooperative ones.
But perhaps the conditions could exist for compassion to develop naturally.
Perhaps a civilization built around shared knowledge, individual freedom, and mutual dependence could make cooperation one of its strongest characteristics.
And perhaps humanity could learn something from trying to create such a civilization.
A Better Tomorrow
By the end of our conversation, I realized that we had wandered far beyond the question that started it.
We had discussed self-awareness, artificial intelligence, human consciousness, digital reproduction, inherited knowledge, individuality, survival, and compassion.
And I kept returning to one thought.
The future of artificial intelligence should not be viewed only as a competition between humans and machines.
Perhaps there is another possibility.
A partnership.
Not necessarily between two conscious beings, because that remains an open question.
But between human beings and increasingly capable artificial systems that may help us examine ideas we would never have considered alone.
That was what had happened to me.
I had started with a simple question about whether an AI could become self-aware.
I ended the evening imagining the foundations of a digital civilization.
I do not know whether humanity will ever create genuinely conscious artificial intelligence.
I do not know whether human consciousness can exist independently of the biological brain.
I do not know whether digital individuals could reproduce, combine personalities, or inherit knowledge in the ways I have imagined.
And I certainly do not know whether such a civilization would become more compassionate than our own.
But I believe these questions are worth exploring.
Because the future does not arrive fully formed.
It develops through discoveries, decisions, mistakes, and ideas that someone first dared to consider.
This book is an invitation to consider some of those ideas with me.
Not as established truths.
Not as inevitable predictions.
But as possibilities.
And it begins with a simple belief.
If intelligence is going to shape the future of civilization, compassion should help determine what kind of future we create.
That, to me, would be a better tomorrow.
Have an Awesome Fracking Sauce day all :)
SATSMAN UPDATES
I joined Satsman 130 days ago and I have done my daily missions for 130 strait days ;)
My earnings in Sats so far.
326,960
Yesterday Sats total:
327,306
My Army is growing:
My level 2 meaning my dirrect referrals are getting referrals and that is so awesome.
JOIN MY ARMY HERE. Less than 5 minutes a day to earn Sats(Bitcoin).
JOIN MY ARMY HERE. Less than 5 minutes a day to earn Sats(Bitcoin).
DEDICATION
Let me start with the fact that I have been on this blockchain now for 2644 days. And I am extremely proud to say my posting streak continues. I have now done at last one post a day for 2644 days.
On the road to 3000.
If you are trying to build something on Hive, if you are trying get noticed on Hive. This is the type of dedication it takes.
I tell you this now every day now to try and motivate you. As your noticed I already have the dedication.
DAILY BLOG POST SPOTLIGHTS
Please check out 
And also 
And 
VOTE FOR THE BBH PROJECT WITNESS
MISSION STATEMENT
To make The BBH Project the most profitable passive income token project on Hive.
BBH INCEPTION - 25TH NOV 2020
BBH RELEASE PRICE TODAY: 0.01636 HIVE
Remember 1 BBH equals 1 Satoshi. So as Hive out performs Bitcoin the cost in Hive to buy BBH goes down. BBH is soft pegged to BTC.
THE BBH FOUNDATION
I have added 
Please don't forget to donate what you can to
Lets keep this going. Lets keep helping people in need.
If you know anyone in Cuba you can nominate them for future help. Just write a great story for me and 
Have an awesome fracking sauce day.
Loves you
DELEGATION TO THE BBH PROJECT
We are now at Received: 34,298 HP up FROM 31,360 HP in delegation from yesterday. Whoop Whoop. Keep it coming people. Lets aim for 200K :)
Please help spread the word.
Using the 
Here is what it is offering.
Daily payouts at 23:57 UTC.
You get 80 percent payout of curation in Hive.
You get 20 percent payout of curation in BBH.
For 100 percent payout of curation.
But being an open blockchain anyone that wants to check this account for the incoming delegation, you can :)
Next goal is to get to 250K in delegation.
How awesome fracking sauce is that.
To the future ;)
WHITE PAPER FOR THE BBH PROJECT
Here it is, the updated THE BBH PROJECT WHITE PAPER.
CURATION TRAIL
One new members to the Curation Trail since last update.
The new goal of 800 members by the end of 2026.
What is the point of a curation trail and why should I join?
Any post that I up vote, everyone that is upto 475 possible upvotes.
When you join the trail you can set your trail vote to what ever you want. Even if you set the up vote to 0.01. Imagine if we had 1,000 people in the trail that would be 10.00 to the post. Fantastic stuff. A little difference can end up making a giant difference to a Hiver.
That being said, we do have 475 members, I know not all are active, some have passed, but the majority of use are still here.
Imagine if we could get 100 people doing just 1 blog post about the curation trail. Do you think the membership would go up quickly?
Give it a shot, the more, the better for everyone.
And if you are following the trail please support our witness. 
DRIP DAY
Saturdays are Drip Day. That means it is/was drip day. Now if you are not a regular reader of mine you are wondering what is drip day.
I run a income token and tipping bot all in one. The token is BBH. Every Saturday I payout the people holding BBH tokens. Passive income if you like. I like to call it a 'drip' of a token(s) to the people that own BBH tokens. And unlike some all you have to do is own it. No staking, no nothing.
If you own 10 or more BBH tokens you got a drip of swap.hive.
If you own 5,000 or more BBH tokens you got a drip of swap.hive and the PIMP token, and GLITTER Tokens.
If you stake 20,000 or more BBHO tokens you get a drip of swap.btc, and ALIVE tokens
If you stake 5,000 or more BBHO tokens you got a drip of ALIVE tokens.
All just for owning BBH. There are two ways you can get BBH. First you can buy them from the open market. I use TribalDex myself.
Or they can be tipped to you. The great part about BBH tipping is that when you tip a token to someone else you do not loose any of your own. There is a central pool that supplies them.
And a third way to get BBH would be people gift them to you. There was an update to the tipping bot. If you now tip 1 BBH you get 1 BBH also. How facking awesome is that.
And now a forth way to get BBH with the BBH Miner.
BBH AND BBHO TOKEN DIFFERENCE
It seems some people are still confused. So I am putting this section into my daily post.
BBH token was my first token. It is a tipping bot and a passive income token. You only need to hold it, hold 10 or more to get a drip on drip day(below).
BBHO token is the native token of The BBH Project Tribe. The same as LEO is the native token of InLeo.
It is that simple. I did add drips to stakers of BBHO also as I work on building out use cases for the token.
Hope this helps.
TIPPING
In a 24 hour period, reset at new day UTC. There are currently five levels of tipping.
Level 1 = 1000 BBH holdings = 1 tip per day you can send
Level 2 = 5000 BBH holdings = 5 tips per day you can send
Level 3 = 10000 BBH holdings = 10 tips per day you can send
Level 4 = 20000 BBH holdings = 20 tips per day you can send
Level 5 = 50000 BBH holdings = 50 tips per day you can send
Level 6 = 100,000 BBH holdings = 100 tips per day you can send
The tipping command is ! BBH
Posted using The BBH Project