Removing Witness Votes

Still EARNED MY Witness Votes:
@c0ff33a Extremely accessible, intelligent and open
@drakos dedicated and active witness
@enginewitty VERY much looking out for new accounts, smaller accounts, and long term health of the blockchain
@jackmiller Very communicative, open and accessible
@themarkymark He's very open with communication
@ats-witness, because, @ats-david has been clear in his communication with me and many others.

Keeping for now...
@followbtcnews @crimsonclad is very communicative, accessible, and one of the most intelligent people on the platform
@guiltyparties brilliant, kind, and also very open and communicative
@steemitboard responsive, good community member, caring people

I am removing Witness Votes:
@adsactly-witness
@aggroed
@blocktrades
@c-squared
@curie
@danielsaori
@good-karma
@gtg
@lukestokes.mhth
@patrice
@pharesim
@someguy123
@steemcreative
@teamsteem
@whiterosecoffee
@yabapmatt

I'd like to hear reasons WHY you should earn my WITNESS Vote?
I'd like you to bear in mind, I am extremely interested in the new accounts, new users, and economic impact the next HF21 will have on new users and content. Tell me, how does HF21 make the value of my steem improve in the eyes of Shareholders and Price.

Right now, all it will do is destroy incentives for new users to come on board and current users to keep making and posting content.

Particularly the top 20 Consenses witnesses, you were asked to respond to a recent dPoll on Steemit regarding HF21. It isn't your views that upset me, it's ignoring the poll. it's ignoring responding to the constituents.

Simply put, HF21, as it stands proposed, has TOOOO much economic change, and MUCH too much uncertainty.
Keep in The SPS, and the Linear curve to correct the past few issues. ONCE the Economic impact and influence of the SPS has taken affect, THEN, consider whether or not the rewards pool is an issue.