My own ideas for a social media platform (if that's really even the correct phrase to describe what I want to build) is radically different from the reward system of the base layer of Hive. They are so

I find it strange how you can separate adoption and function. They are strongly related. If you read every line, then you also read that I don't think the goal of Hive should be "adoption at any

FWIW, I think his main argument is that 10 votes per day drives big voters to auto-vote, which I think has some truth to it. That in turn leads to centralization of voting (how well it then gets distributed

I don't know that he's getting a lot of traction, that really remains to be seen. All that seemed clear at first glance is there wasn't any interest in 1 vote per day.

I expect we'll start looking into the state of SMTs and alternatives in 2-3 weeks, after we're no longer buried in HF24 work.

I don't think "cool" is the word many people here would use to describe this behavior. I certainly wouldn't. As it happens, I posted this in a community, which means I or another moderator could

Yes. @transisto has been the big proponent for this. He's suggested as few as 1 per day (with 10x power), which didn't get much traction. Lately he suggested dropping from 10 per day to 5 per day (with

I mostly agree with all your points, although I think the risk of a centralized takover will not be high in the near term, once the delayed stake voting is deployed, which removes the highest risk of a

Check and see if you also got an even larger upvote from ranchorelaxo. I have a bot setup that reduces the power of his random upvotes.

I still feel like it's wrong. I see for "orcas" 190 active and 106 inactive. From my point of view, I would expect the red to be bigger than the gray, yet it's reversed. But maybe I'm just

Oh, and a related question: are system accounts excluded (i.e. the HDF account)?

A question about the cumulative hive power per level graph: Is it looking at raw or effective MVESTS of an account when measuring active/inactive totals? I think it should account for delegated power.

I think there's a bug in your number of accounts per level graph. The active/inactive proportion doesn't seem correct graphically, compared to the numbers on the graph.

As far as I can tell, this is a closed-source project. Is that correct? I'm asking as I was originally planning to vote for it after playing around with the site, but I'm not generally a fan of voting

Yes, the amount of impact on reputation is directly proportional to the percentage of voting power used. This applies the same for both upvotes and downvotes. Note that reputation values are displayed

Muting within a community mutes the post from everyone viewing posts in that community, not just the person doing the muting. So a community lets you setup a "safe space" to share information

You are correct, it works similar to witness voting and full stake applies to all votes.

Counting me, BlockTrades currently has 12 developers working on hive.

Yes, the ability to get incoming delegations needs to first be supported via some database service like Hivemind. I'll check on it and see how much work it is.

I tagged @quochuy, who is probably the most active condenser/wallet dev right now, but I don't know if Iain is active on the platform: the code he wrote was written a long time ago.