Viewo: Profit is the best incentive

The user selects the Internet

It is no secret to anyone that the Internet will completely pull the blanket of user attention in the next few years. Earlier, families gathered in the evening for a specific transfer, but now everyone with their device looks at something that he likes more. Moreover, with the development of the introduction of the Internet connection to television screens, many users simply refused to use television services - it is much more profitable to pay for a subscription to Netflix than to give TV shows out on screens and watch constant TV advertising.

Source: Newsy

In addition, the products that television produces are often inferior to their network competitor: even the YouTube broadcasts are now filmed much more competently than what TV offers us. What to say about the giants of video-streaming services. The fact that the time of feedback from the public of television and the Internet is significantly different: users of web services, using anonymity and the possibility of unlimited commentary, do not miss the moment to draw public attention to specific shortcomings. So, if for TV-transmission success is the output to TV screens, then for the Internet this is only a small part of it.

Increased motivation for the creator

Nevertheless, the quality of broadcasts on the Internet can be made even higher if we eliminate a number of factors that ensure the stagnation of the sphere:

Compensation of the creators. Surely you know how profitable media space can be now. The lion's share of the celebrities of today became known, or support their fame, thanks to YouTube. For some entrepreneurs who use video hosting as a promotional personal brand, YouTube has become one of the main sources of revenue.

But the real profit brings only a massive product. If we talk about highly specialized channels and authors, their profits will not impress you greatly. All thanks to the policy of placement of advertising and targeting, which acts on the hosting. As a result, not all are fairly rewarded. The motivation of individual shakers is falling.

Imperfect feedback. The success for video recording on YouTube and other hosting services depends on how often other users view it. At the same time, their attitude is practically not taken into account. That is, if you take off so bad content that you want to see it for the sake of example, you will be successful. It's terrible to imagine how many such "stars" are now making profit due to our attention.

Lack of control over the content. We are not talking about total censorship, and this, of course, will not be on Viewo, but you will agree that some ordering for video recordings on hosting would be useful. With this, even the content creators themselves agree: thus, it will be easier for them to find their target audience.

The project, which we are talking about today, will cope with all this. The first problem is reward. Imagine that you have found an incredibly interesting channel and do not want its creator to lose motivation for further production. But to drop the victim for him, just like for Wikipedia, is not yet included in the value system of a typical website user, like YouTube.

Instead, it would be prudent to reward it with the coins that you earned when viewing the video. You got them not with your own work, but because someone created interesting content for society. Such tokens are not a pity to give to the author.

As a result, he will receive from his fans not only likes and subscriptions that are converted into profits under certain favorable conditions, but immediately after the loyal user shows his highest degree of loyalty.

Also, content creators, like other users, will be able to profit from what helps make Viewo a more comfortable place for the user. Defining the quality of the content by voting is a distinctive feature of the decentralized platform.

But to avoid content bullying, the possibility of voting will not be given to everyone. As practice shows, the voting rights have either large token holdings, or users with already high ratings, who have no interest in harming someone's reputation on the platform.