It's Ovyr: Anticipating "Humiliation", Humiliating Milley OSINT Self Own, Miley Dooms, Kim and Putin Dread, Blinken Copes Over G20, Former Czech Intel Chief Dooms On Quiiv, Fictional Breakthrough and More
This is the place you get to, Acceptance, on the road out of denial:
Quick question, why would Russians be affected, at ALL, by taking assets you've already seized? Imagine if the cope for the "coming" humiliation needs a paragraph for that as the conclusion, how bad it must be to know that you've emptied your weapons stockpiles, made your equipment and training the laughing stock of the world and in doing so undermined all the unearned decades of Stronkness, again.
The Germans Are Tired Of Being Cucks?
Meanwhile the Butcher of Queef threatens them with refugee terrorism, while expressing gratitude:
More people have died from high energy prices than in the war, democide at the hands of retards:
Three months for their mightiest tank to fail to destroy another tank in it's ever first such engagement:
Despite using their most powerful rounds:
The Firepocket gets more interesting:
Getting Burned:
To The Last Ukrainian!
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg confirms that Russia invaded in response to the threat of NATO expansion.
"So he [Putin] went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders."
For 18 months, academics have been censored, cancelled, bullied and smeared as "Russian propagandists" for starting this obvious fact
NATO: Opening Remarks https://t.me/glenndiesen/110
⚡️NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg did not deny information about 500,000 Ukrainian military deaths
MEP: "You said that Ukraine is gradually conquering territory. But that is not true. Half a million people have died. Now they have started to mobilise even those who are not fit and sick..."
Stoltenberg: "No one ever said it would be easy. We see that Russia has built up its defences properly". https://t.me/ukraine_watch/8286
Andrei Medvedev writes
It is very likely that for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, the small settlement of Rabotino and its surroundings are turning into a new Bakhmut. Just as the Ukrainian authorities - both military and political - killed combat-ready units in Bakhmut, a similar picture is emerging in Rabotino.
It is difficult for an outsider, far from the army, to understand what the fundamental significance of this settlement is for Kiev. But it is no less difficult for a military man to understand why the Ukrainian Armed Forces are so stubborn and certainly want to raise the yellow block flag over the charred ruins.
The fact is that by the beginning of the offensive, everything was going very, very well for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Western technology, detailed intelligence data, and a sufficient number of personnel. Everything pointed to the fact that the Ukrainian Armed Forces would try to deliver two main strikes, and in the most vulnerable directions. Kherson region and Zaporozhye, for example.
I believed that the Ukrainian Armed Forces would definitely not strike in the direction of Crimea (this is a stupid idea). It seemed logical to me that the first strike would be in the direction of Melitopol/Berdyansk to cut through the group and the land corridor to Crimea (this is a serious problem when attacking a bridge). But the second blow, as for me, would be logical for the enemy to strike either in the Belgorod/Kursk region with an attempt to take two or three populated areas and establish control there for at least a few days. Or an attack on Donetsk from the Avdeevsky fortified area, with an attempt to catch on to the outskirts of the city. Both options would be very much in the style of Kiev: PR, hype, information war (something that we are bad at fending off), and if the circumstances are bad for us, causing real damage to us.
There were attempts to penetrate into the Kursk and Belgorod regions, yes. Punishers from the RDK carried out raids. But these were not serious military operations. The Ukrainian Armed Forces had enough Western long-range missiles, but the Ukrainian Armed Forces did not implement the idea of striking our rear areas. We couldn't do it right away. And then our air defense quickly reorganized.
Why all the possibilities were not realized, and why the Ukrainian Armed Forces decided not to use the two-strike tactic, one can only guess. It is possible, and most likely, that the decisions were not made in Kiev at all, but NATO has its own vision of how to fight with free Ukrainians.
Moreover, the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine already in the first days of the offensive realized that nothing would work out. What is worth taking a break from now and preparing for a new operation? Maybe even next spring. But who asked the opinion of the Ukrainian generals? NATO decided otherwise.
As a result, success was not achieved in the southern direction. And a new offensive requires additional resources. People first of all. They are now being caught on the streets of Ukrainian cities.
But still, it is very interesting to understand who exactly made the decisions about what and where to attack. Because now Kiev and the West blame each other (and together Russian fortifications and Russian bushes). It will be funny if many years later it turns out that the plan for the summer offensive should have been developed by NATO, but out of laziness, they simply took some old exercise plan from the archive, simply hoping that the Russians would be scared anyway. https://t.me/Slavyangrad/62578
