One of the great things about being a part of Reality Hubbers is the good response so I continue to learn from our communication. I have read many times articles and opinions that have received "perfect" awards from curators at RealityHubs.

Frankly, I like the ideology of this platform. As a writer and journalist in Indonesia, reviewing books, films, events, and writing opinions is part of my work. So since knowing this platform, I immediately invested in selling all available Steem to buy RHB Power. The amount is not large, but it is quite meaningful to me.

For some of the previous articles, I agree. my post is not in accordance with the vision and mission of RealityHubs. However, several others, I think already meet the criteria. I have given a personal view, an analysis, and have given a conclusion even though I don't have to write special subtitles about "Conclusions". The reader knows that is the conclusion of the narrative that we describe even though there is no word "conclusion" in it.

Especially for the article above, I really do not understand which parts are not included in the review. The article is an analysis of investment in our province which is not much different from other provinces in Indonesia and even in other countries. So, please forgive me, I don't understand which part doesn't meet the criteria. This is still a big question for me.

But, I will continue to try to continue to post articles, either by using two languages ​​or only Indonesian. I am sure, I will be able to adapt the writing to the vision and mission of RealityHubs.

Thank so much for your response that was truly extraordinary @knowledges. Warm greetings from Indonesia.
@ayijufridar