In order for one thing to be created believable, it should be internalised. That's to mention; it's not enough for a phenomenon to have occurred; its incidence should have already taken place among the individual's imagination.
Objectification may be a product of the mind; if something happens outside of the individual who in his mind is not possible, he will doubt his own senses.
On July 20, 1969, the first manned spacecraft landed on the moon. Millions of individuals witnessed the event via their tv sets; but, within the face of empirical evidence, conspiracy theorists then and now refused and still refuse to believe it.
Secondly, if someone believes something is very likely, even if he's unable to prove it and in the face of contradictory evidence, it's an act of futility to undertake to convince him otherwise. Objectivity doesn't exist outside of the mind, and it'll not be negated due to external evidence.
If someone changes his mind regarding one thing, he's not going from possibility to impossibility or the other way around however from one probability to another. To most atheists, the existence of God isn't impossible however rather extremely unlikely. Conversely, to most theists, the nonexistence of God isn't impossible however likewise extremely improbable.
The theist objectifies his belief in God; he externalises that which exists in his imagination. The atheist subjectifies his belief in God; he internalises that that is foreign to his own experience.
To clarify this, because the theist externalises that which is on the inside, he projects God out into the world; and, because the atheist internalises that which falls outside of his own experience, he negates God's presence within the world and reflects it back to the imagination.
Those things that we tend to see outside of ourselves are simply projections of possibilities that exist inside our minds, and those things that we see among our imaginations are simply reflections of these things we fail to envision outside of ourselves.
