First of all, I would like to write a few words about this @familyprotection label and let me say some things that you can see in the publications of this label, I know it's a patented tag by @markwhittam and @canadian-coconut and I think they are doing an excellent I work, but something worries me a little about this, I am a very sincere and honest person, and I can not stop commenting on what I see and it is a constructive criticism.

On 03/03/2018, @markwhittam commented on what was happening with the tag @familyprotection, where a series of problems are presented, which I think are important and should be resolved as soon as possible, among these problems
we find:

The content of the publication, which does not conform to the label.
Voting publication, which does not consider contributing anything to this fight.
Few contributions made by your post voted, among others.

APPROACH:

In my particular case, they informed me when I made one of my first publications on this label, which must be related only to the abuse of the government towards children and separated from their parents. Also keep in mind that in your publications, that only this label should be used for this type of message, textual words, says:

“We at @familyprotection, want to reward people for good, high quality and original posts which are going to help us all get a clearer picture of the horrors that can occur at the hands of the various government agencies that all profit from removing children from loving families.

What is an Original Post?

Part of raising awareness for @familyprotection is finding stories that are usually hidden from the general public and bringing them to light. We do encourage this on the one hand, but if you simply copy and paste an article, and don't even bother to give your own original thought on the matter at hand then the upvote you receive, if any! will reflect your lack of effort. And if you go as far as to not even link the source to your copy and paste job, then I'm sorry but your GONE!”

But in reality, I've seen that there are publications that do NOT have the content of the label and the votes were given, as well as others that really do fit the content and were not voted, I think we should really analyze what is happening and maintain a only criteria. (To vote for messages that conform to the demands of the label), it would be good to evaluate this situation. It is also true that everyone can vote for the publication they want, but we must be clear about what this label was created for.

This community (Steemit) was created to publish with diverse contents, which can be studies, researches, experiences, histories, among others, but the main point is to obtain other income for the work that is carried out. In my particular case, I think I should really review the votes that are granted and see if they meet the requirements of the @familyprotection tag.

It may also be the case that we give votes to posts with the @familyprotection tag, because they have interesting content, but in reality they do not conform to the content of the tag.
This is one of the causes that affects and causes people to question the reality of the content required by the @familyprotection tag and then can publish several contents because they believe that they should be voted as the previous publication.

EXAMPLE:

If the publication does not have the content that the label looks for, but it is a publication that can have value in its content, the participant must be told that with this label he will not be able to obtain votes and that he must use another label to receive upvoto and of this way to evaluate and vote the content of this publication if you want to reward the presented publication, with its new label, I think it would be the best way to open the content and the voting option for each of them.

Another important point, I think that most people who make their publications, explore their content and maybe use many hours of their time to make their publications, because otherwise the robot would be (cheetah (73), which would show that The content presented is a copy of something that already exists on the web (Hello, I'm a robot, I just promoted it! I found similar content that readers might be interested in), not only when publishing on this label, but also on varieties of them.

Also, when I started my publications with this label, I did not really know what it was created for and they told me that the content that the publications should have was the one mentioned above, from that moment I tried to adjust in each of my publications to those demands .

I will continue to help @familyprotection, with the effort of my contributions in my publication and I confirm that they will obtain my contribution of 25% of my votes, and it will be my initiative to help this beautiful cause. I hope that the community is integrated and also contributes and little by little can grow more. Thank you all and I hope you take this initiative and also support this cause.

And being a bit more demanding, as of this date (03/03/2018), in which the problem was observed, it would start from the idea of tracking the people who published on this label and who were voted by the team from @familyprotection and who did not donate anything to this cause, so as not to make them more votes in their next publications, since they would be taking advantage of making a profit, without understanding the content of this label.

I know it sounds ugly, but you should take an initiative to see if this situation can be resolved and people can become aware of where these donations go.

NOTE:

I hope that the proposal is not considered as a destructive criticism and that it somehow serves to be able to resolve little by little the situation we have.

If @familyprotection considers that I do not use this label anymore, because I am not up to the demands, my publications do not have the desired content or my comments are not correct, I will gladly abstain from using them, I had to express the situation I feel and from my point of view.

Greetings to all readers of this content.