Here we go again with repeating the rebuke of the same banal crap that people regurgitate over and over again. When will they finally suffocate in their vomit so I can stop getting dragged into the mud of having to swat every fly. Essentially you zombies force me to play Whac-A-Mole with you.

Remember the "Satoshi's Shotgun" buffoonery from last year? This bullshit was not even able to shot in his own feet :D

Yeah I remember he moved the entire market from $6k to $3k. Do you check in with reality much?

knows that SV is just an altcoin

Inkblot. That shitcoin BSV has nothing to do with anything I’m writing about. BSV is not Bitcoin. I’m writing about Bitcoin.

Anyone God gave a brain and who is willing to use it

And yet you are running your propaganda-controlled, ignorant, zombie mouth without even reading all your assigned homework first.

I wrote:

So I don´t get the following: I don´t see any scenario where neither SegWit nor legacy can become Satoshis Vision.

Agreed. BSV isn’t legacy Bitcoin (because it mutated, has adaptive block sizes, etc) and doesn’t support SegWit. The ongoing (not sunk costs] “unforgeable costliness” production costs of minting Bitcoin (i.e. the value of Bitcoin) can’t be transferred to BSV. BSV is a completely separate shitcoin in the cryptocosm, with the only connection being it was airdropped (i.e. distributed) to all Bitcoin hodlers.

I wrote on BCTalk:

So now we see that BSV is just a deco[y]. What Craig (or his backers) really want is the real Bitcoin. They fool the plebs into thinking he wants scaling and BSV.

I wrote on BCTalk:

Nonsense. A soft fork is not a fork because it doesn’t force the hodlers of BTC to make a decision. Read the Rogue Wave thread and educate yourself.

BSV is nothing but a decoy shitcoin. Craig’s globalist backers are fooling you. They will force Core to fork off and destroy itself. What remains will be the legacy, immutable Bitcoin.

I wrote on BCTalk:

Craig is indeed a fake Satoshi and his BSV is probably a red-herring, but his warning [about Bitcoin] is probably reality. Read the linked threads entirely to learn why.

I wrote on BCTalk:

C ) bsv, stay as clean as possible and openly go the most transparent and regulation friendly road map?

Whether you like it or not, the store-of-value coin is Satoshi’s immutable v0.5.3 protocol. And this will be enforced soon with the SegWit donations attack on the Core shitcoin. Per my first post in this thread (relayed via @infofront because this is very important), Craig is apparently claiming they will initiate Satoshi’s cleverly designed defense mechanism. So Craig is playing the role of fooling those mindless bunny rabbits (http://trilema.com/2018/how-to-piss-me-the-fuck-off-a-guide/) who idolize nonsense so much that they can’t even correctly interpret what Craig is really saying. This is again how Satan is giving people their free will as he corrupts them with idolization. You have your free will to correctly interpret that invariants of the reality here, or irrationally idolize what you wish would a snowflake reality.

I wrote on BCTalk:

Indeed while all the snowflakes will be buying BSV thinking that is the savior from this “attack”, Craig will be ostensibly selling BSV at the peak stupidity of greater fools, and buying the real BTC. I presume what he will do is sell BSV for Tether then later use the Tether to buy real BTC once everything stabilizes and new exchanges are created (or extant exchanges that survive do a split) that honor Satoshi's protocol instead of Core.

I wrote on BCTalk:

I explained to you upthread that adaptive block size is not trustless, decentralized. Thus neither BCH nor BSV are the original, immutable Bitcoin. And thus with BSV what you get is an exciting, mutable shitcoin akin to silver instead of gold. See the chart below for the horrible valuation of silver versus gold…

I wrote on BCTalk:

I never thought I'd see a group of people more gullible and pathetic than the BSV crowd but, WOW.

Your reading comprehension is so low that you don’t even realize that I rebuked the BSV-fanboy @hv_ in my prior post (and several before that as well). I am not a BSV supporter. I am a Satoshi v0.5.3 immutable protocol supporter.

If you start with false premises (i.e. incorrectly presuming that I am a BSV advocate), then your dependent reasoning is flawed.

I wrote on BCTalk:

Dr Craig Wright & Jimmy Nguyen | Bitcoin and Blockchain | Oxford Union

Craig seems sincere but perhaps he’s just a good actor. I loved his argument at the end about equality in law is the antithesis of equality in outcomes. That is a high IQ conceptualization. Kudos. I rarely have the patience to watch a 1 hour video.

The flaws I see in his reasoning:

1. Recording of all data so that omniscient governments can be held accountable is totalitarianism because accountability does nothing to fix the Iron Law of Political Economics which insures that democracy will always be about selling infinite debt to infinite wants. Transparency of data can’t rectify that flaw of democracy. So given the Weberian definition of government, removing our ability to be private means absolute enslavement. Governance will become an Orwellian winner-take-all 666 if we follow Craig’s naivete.

2. The “solution” of BSV for transaction volume scaling is essentially centralization. Thus the outcome of totalitarian control or failure due to infighting due to the inability for one mining/dev group to subjugate the will of another.

So in short, Craig’s Vision (an impostor pretending to be Satoshi’s Vision) is worthless. He either knows this, or is incredibly naive.

Please forward my criticisms to Craig.

Btw, I debated Craig a couple years ago in one of his private slack channels and they ended up banning me because I was winning all the arguments. Go ask @kLee et al.

There’s a shitload of background reading you need to do and think deeply about before replying.